Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366966›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach.

Maggie Westemeyer, Jennifer Saucier, Jody Wallace, Sarah A Prins, Aparna Shetty, Meenakshi Malhotra, Zachary P Demko, Christine M Eng, Louis Weckstein, Robert Boostanfar and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The clinical utility of carrier screening.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Application of clinical exome sequencing in sperm donor screening in China.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maggie Westemeyer *Natera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Jennifer Saucier *Natera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Jody WallaceNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Sarah A PrinsNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Aparna ShettyNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Meenakshi MalhotraNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Zachary P DemkoNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Christine M EngBaylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories, Houston, TX, USA.
Louis WecksteinReproductive Science Center of the San Francisco Bay Area, San Ramon, CA, USA.
Robert BoostanfarHuntington Reproductive Center Fertility, Encino, CA, USA.
Matthew RabinowitzNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Peter BennDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Dianne Keen-KimNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Paul BillingsNatera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA. pbillings@natera.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1198-0537
Natera (United States) · USBaylor Genetics · USReproductive Science Center · USUConn Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present results from a large cohort of individuals receiving expanded carrier screening (CS) in the United States.

methodsSingle-gene disorder carrier status for 381,014 individuals was determined using next-generation sequencing (NGS) based CS for up to 274 genes. Detection rates were compared with literature-reported values derived from disease prevalence and carrier frequencies. Combined theoretical affected pregnancy rates for the 274 screened disorders were calculated.

resultsFor Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) diseases, 81.6% (4434/5435) of carriers identified did not report AJ ancestry. For cystic fibrosis, 44.0% (6260/14,229) of carriers identified had a variant not on the standard genotyping panel. Individuals at risk of being a silent spinal muscular atrophy carrier, not detectable by standard screening, comprised 1/39 (8763/344,407) individuals. For fragile X syndrome, compared with standard premutation screening, AGG interruption analysis modified risk in 83.2% (1128/1356) premutation carriers. Assuming random pairing across the study population, approximately 1/175 pregnancies would be affected by a disorder in the 274-gene screening panel.

conclusionCompared with standard screening, NGS-based CS provides additional information that may impact reproductive choices. Pan-ethnic CS leads to substantially increased identification of at-risk couples. These data support offering NGS-based CS to all reproductive-aged women.

Indexed as

Fragile X SyndromeGenetic TestingAdultEthnicityFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningHeterozygoteHumansUnited Statescarrier frequenciescarrier screeningpan-ethnic screeningpathogenic variantssingle-gene disorders

Identifiers

PMID32366966
PMCPMC7394882
OpenAlexW3023589228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.