Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Rapid event-related, BOLD fMRI, non-human primates (NHP): choose two out of three.

Vassilis Pelekanos, Robert M Mok, Olivier Joly, Matthew Ainsworth, Diana Kyriazis, Maria G Kelly, Andrew H Bell, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vassilis PelekanosMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. vassilis.pelekanos@nottingham.ac.uk.
Robert M MokMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7261-9257
Olivier JolyMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew AinsworthMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5767-7704
Diana KyriazisMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Maria G KellyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrew H BellMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-4622
Nikolaus KriegeskorteMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) typically employs the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast mechanism. In non-human primates (NHP), contrast enhancement is possible using monocrystalline iron-oxide nanoparticles (MION) contrast agent, which has a more temporally extended response function. However, using BOLD fMRI in NHP is desirable for interspecies comparison, and the BOLD signal's faster response function promises to be beneficial for rapid event-related (rER) designs. Here, we used rER BOLD fMRI in macaque monkeys while viewing real-world images, and found visual responses and category selectivity consistent with previous studies. However, activity estimates were very noisy, suggesting that the lower contrast-to-noise ratio of BOLD, suboptimal behavioural performance, and motion artefacts, in combination, render rER BOLD fMRI challenging in NHP. Previous studies have shown that rER fMRI is possible in macaques with MION, despite MION's prolonged response function. To understand this, we conducted simulations of the BOLD and MION response during rER, and found that no matter how fast the design, the greater amplitude of the MION response outweighs the contrast loss caused by greater temporal smoothing. We conclude that although any two of the three elements (rER, BOLD, NHP) have been shown to work well, the combination of all three is particularly challenging.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsContrast MediaFerrosoferric OxideMacaca mulattaMaleNanoparticlesContrast MediaFerrosoferric Oxidemonocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID32366956
PMCPMC7198564
OpenAlexW3021306343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.