ReviewLeukemia2020
Expert opinion-management of chronic myeloid leukemia after resistance to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Review in Leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Trial
- A combination of artemisinin, moxidectin, and doxorubicin drugs can selectively and efficiently induce apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic and chronic myeloid leukemia cells in vitro and ex vivo.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Article
- Targeting ABL Tyrosine Kinase in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Computational Studies of Novel Thiazolone Derivatives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Evolving Therapeutic Algorithms in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Integrating Efficacy, Safety, and Survivorship.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Understanding disease management and the patient journey in chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the CML SUN survey in South Korean patients and physicians.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis and recent trends on tyrosine kinase inhibitors in leukemia.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The silent players: AtypicalOncology reports · 2025Review
- Therapeutic positioning of asciminib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients previously treated with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Qatar.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Management of chronic-phase CML in later lines: a Hong Kong consensus recommendation.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Review
- Real-World Efficacy Profile of Compassionate Use of Asciminib in an Italian, Multi-Resistant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) Patient Population.Hematological oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Longitudinal analysis of usage and public awareness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for CML.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- GIMEMA survey on the management of chronic myeloid leukemia patients in the third line and beyond: insights from Italian hematologists.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and signaling pathways of tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia: A comprehensive review.Leukemia research reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Novel betulin derivatives as multidrug reversal agents targeting P-glycoprotein.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regardless of line of therapy, treatment goals in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are: avoid progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis CML such that patients achieve a life expectancy comparable with that of the general population; avoid adverse events (AEs); and restore and maintain quality of life. The most important prognostic factor for achieving these goals is response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at key milestones. For patients failing a TKI, a treatment change is mandatory to limit the risk of progression and death. There is currently no precise guideline for patients that fail a second-generation TKI, and there is a paucity of data to guide clinical decision making in this setting. There is, therefore, an unmet need for practical and actionable guidance on how to manage patients who fail a second-generation TKI. Although the term 'failure' includes patients failing for resistance or intolerance, the focus of this paper is failure of a second-generation TKI because of resistance. CML patients who fail their first second-generation TKI for true resistance need a more potent therapy. In these patients, the key issues to consider are the relative appropriateness of early allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or the use of a further TKI. Selection of the next line of treatment after second-generation TKI resistance should be individualized and must be based on patient-specific factors including cytogenetics, mutation profile, comorbidities, age, previous history of AEs with prior TKI therapy, and risk profile for AEs on specific TKIs. This expert opinion paper is not in conflict with existing recommendations, but instead represents an evolution of previous notions, based on new data, insights, and clinical experience. We review the treatment options for patients resistant to second-generation TKI therapy and provide our clinical opinions and guidance on key considerations for treatment decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.