Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366938›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2020

Expert opinion-management of chronic myeloid leukemia after resistance to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Andreas Hochhaus, Massimo Breccia, Giuseppe Saglio, Valentín García-Gutiérrez, Delphine Réa, Jeroen Janssen, Jane Apperley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The silent players: AtypicalOncology reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Andreas HochhausKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany. andreas.hochhaus@med.uni-jena.de.
Massimo BrecciaSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SaglioUniversity of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Valentín García-GutiérrezHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Delphine RéaHôpital St. Louis, Paris, France.
Jeroen JanssenDepartment of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, loc. VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jane ApperleyHammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHôpital Saint-Louis · FRImperial College London · GBInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESJena University Hospital · DESapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regardless of line of therapy, treatment goals in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are: avoid progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis CML such that patients achieve a life expectancy comparable with that of the general population; avoid adverse events (AEs); and restore and maintain quality of life. The most important prognostic factor for achieving these goals is response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at key milestones. For patients failing a TKI, a treatment change is mandatory to limit the risk of progression and death. There is currently no precise guideline for patients that fail a second-generation TKI, and there is a paucity of data to guide clinical decision making in this setting. There is, therefore, an unmet need for practical and actionable guidance on how to manage patients who fail a second-generation TKI. Although the term 'failure' includes patients failing for resistance or intolerance, the focus of this paper is failure of a second-generation TKI because of resistance. CML patients who fail their first second-generation TKI for true resistance need a more potent therapy. In these patients, the key issues to consider are the relative appropriateness of early allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or the use of a further TKI. Selection of the next line of treatment after second-generation TKI resistance should be individualized and must be based on patient-specific factors including cytogenetics, mutation profile, comorbidities, age, previous history of AEs with prior TKI therapy, and risk profile for AEs on specific TKIs. This expert opinion paper is not in conflict with existing recommendations, but instead represents an evolution of previous notions, based on new data, insights, and clinical experience. We review the treatment options for patients resistant to second-generation TKI therapy and provide our clinical opinions and guidance on key considerations for treatment decision making.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32366938
PMCPMC7266739
OpenAlexW3022401266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.