Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

MicroRNA Profiling of Highly Enriched Human Corneal Epithelial Stem Cells by Small RNA Sequencing.

Lavanya Kalaimani, Bharanidharan Devarajan, Umadevi Subramanian, Vanniarajan Ayyasamy, Venkatesh Prajna Namperumalsamy, Muthukkaruppan Veerappan, Gowri Priya Chidambaranathan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Corneal Epithelial Regeneration: Old and New Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Regulation of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells: Importance of the Niche.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lavanya KalaimaniDepartment of Immunology and Stem Cell Biology, Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bharanidharan DevarajanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Umadevi SubramanianDepartment of Bioinformatics, Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vanniarajan AyyasamyDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Venkatesh Prajna NamperumalsamyCornea Clinic, Aravind Eye Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Muthukkaruppan VeerappanDepartment of Immunology and Stem Cell Biology, Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gowri Priya ChidambaranathanDepartment of Immunology and Stem Cell Biology, Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. gowri@aravind.org.
Alagappa University · INAravind Eye Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to elucidate the microRNA (miRNA) profile of an enriched human corneal epithelial stem cell (CESC) population in comparison to differentiated central corneal epithelial cells (CCECs) by small RNA sequencing. The CESCs were enriched by differential enzymatic treatment to isolate the basal limbal epithelial cells followed by laser capture microdissection of cells with nucleus to cytoplasm ratio ≥0.7, from donor tissues. Small RNA sequencing was carried out using Illumina NextSeq. 500 platform and the validation of differentially expressed miRNAs by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and locked nucleic acid miRNA in-situ hybridization (LNA-ISH). The sequencing identified 62 miRNAs in CESCs and 611 in CCECs. Six miRNAs: hsa-miR-21-5p, 3168, 143-3p, 10a-5p, 150-5p and 1910-5p were found to be significantly upregulated in enriched CESCs, which was further confirmed by qPCR and LNA-ISH. The expression of hsa-miR-143-3p was exclusive to clusters of limbal basal epithelial cells. The targets of the upregulated miRNAs were predicted to be associated with signaling pathways -Wnt, PI3K-AKT, MAPK and pathways that regulate pluripotency of stem cells, cell migration, growth and proliferation. Further studies are essential to elucidate their functional role in maintenance of stemness. The findings of the study also hypothesize the inherent potential of hsa-miR-143-3p to serve as a biomarker for identifying CESCs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSequence Analysis, RNABiomarkersCell MovementCell ProliferationCorneaEpithelial CellsGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLaser Capture MicrodissectionMicroRNAsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionStem CellsUp-RegulationBiomarkersMicroRNAsMIRN143 microRNA, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases

Identifiers

PMID32366885
PMCPMC7198595
OpenAlexW3023305909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.