Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366838›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Prediction of the Mortality Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients using Machine Learning Models: A Nation-wide Prospective Cohort in Korea.

Junhyug Noh, Kyung Don Yoo, Wonho Bae, Jong Soo Lee, Kangil Kim, Jang-Hee Cho, Hajeong Lee, Dong Ki Kim, Chun Soo Lim, Shin-Wook Kang and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Decoding Natural Language Processing and Large Language Models in Kidney Health.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Junhyug Noh *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung Don Yoo *Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-6517
Wonho BaeCollege of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts, United States.
Jong Soo LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea.
Kangil KimSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-6401
Jang-Hee ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Hajeong LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong Ki KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5195-7852
Chun Soo LimDepartment of Internal Medicine Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9123-6542
Shin-Wook KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yong-Lim KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Yon Su KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Gunhee KimDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. gunhee@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-7453
Jung Pyo LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. nephrolee@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-1260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we aim to assess mortality risk prediction in peritoneal dialysis patients using machine-learning algorithms for proper prognosis prediction. A total of 1,730 peritoneal dialysis patients in the CRC for ESRD prospective cohort from 2008 to 2014 were enrolled in this study. Classification algorithms were used for prediction of N-year mortality including neural network. The survival hazard ratio was presented by machine-learning algorithms using survival statistics and was compared to conventional algorithms. A survival-tree algorithm presented the most accurate prediction model and outperformed a conventional method such as Cox regression (concordance index 0.769 vs 0.745). Among various survival decision-tree models, the modified Charlson Comorbidity index (mCCI) was selected as the best predictor of mortality. If peritoneal dialysis patients with high mCCI (>4) were aged ≥70.5 years old, the survival hazard ratio was predicted as 4.61 compared to the overall study population. Among the various algorithm using longitudinal data, the AUC value of logistic regression was augmented at 0.804. In addition, the deep neural network significantly improved performance to 0.841. We propose machine learning-based final model, mCCI and age were interrelated as notable risk factors for mortality in Korean peritoneal dialysis patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalMortalityAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal DialysisPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32366838
PMCPMC7198502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.