Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366319›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2020

A united statement of the global chiropractic research community against the pseudoscientific claim that chiropractic care boosts immunity.

Pierre Côté, André Bussières, J David Cassidy, Jan Hartvigsen, Greg N Kawchuk, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Silvano Mior, Michael Schneider, 140 signatories# call for an end to pseudoscientific claims on the effect of chiropractic care on immune function

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Misinformation, chiropractic, and the COVID-19 pandemic.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Pierre CôtéFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada. pierre.cote@uoit.ca.
André BussièresDépartement chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.
J David CassidyDivision of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jan HartvigsenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Greg N KawchukFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Charlotte Leboeuf-YdeInstitute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Silvano MiorCentre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and CMCC, Oshawa, Canada.
Michael SchneiderSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
140 signatories# call for an end to pseudoscientific claims on the effect of chiropractic care on immune function
Ontario Tech University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, the International Chiropractors Association (ICA) posted reports claiming that chiropractic care can impact the immune system. These claims clash with recommendations from the World Health Organization and World Federation of Chiropractic. We discuss the scientific validity of the claims made in these ICA reports. MAIN BODY: We reviewed the two reports posted by the ICA on their website on March 20 and March 28, 2020. We explored the method used to develop the claim that chiropractic adjustments impact the immune system and discuss the scientific merit of that claim. We provide a response to the ICA reports and explain why this claim lacks scientific credibility and is dangerous to the public. More than 150 researchers from 11 countries reviewed and endorsed our response.

conclusionIn their reports, the ICA provided no valid clinical scientific evidence that chiropractic care can impact the immune system. We call on regulatory authorities and professional leaders to take robust political and regulatory action against those claiming that chiropractic adjustments have a clinical impact on the immune system.

Indexed as

ImmunizationManipulation, ChiropracticChiropracticCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSocieties, MedicalChiropracticCoronavirusImmunityPseudoscienceSpinal manipulation

Identifiers

PMID32366319
PMCPMC7197358
OpenAlexW3022137886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.