Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366225›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Comparative analysis of similarity measurements in miRNAs with applications to miRNA-disease association predictions.

Hailin Chen, Ruiyu Guo, Guanghui Li, Wei Zhang, Zuping Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hailin ChenSchool of Software, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, 330013, China. chl_mail@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5119-4517
Ruiyu GuoSchool of Software, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Guanghui LiSchool of Information Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Science, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Zuping ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61862026the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China 20181BAB202008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs regulators of gene expression, microRNAs (miRNAs) are increasingly recognized as critical biomarkers of human diseases. Till now, a series of computational methods have been proposed to predict new miRNA-disease associations based on similarity measurements. Different categories of features in miRNAs are applied in these methods for miRNA-miRNA similarity calculation. Benchmarking tests on these miRNA similarity measures are warranted to assess their effectiveness and robustness.

resultsIn this study, 5 categories of features, i.e. miRNA sequences, miRNA expression profiles in cell-lines, miRNA expression profiles in tissues, gene ontology (GO) annotations of miRNA target genes and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms of miRNA-associated diseases, are collected and similarity values between miRNAs are quantified based on these feature spaces, respectively. We systematically compare the 5 similarities from multi-statistical views. Furthermore, we adopt a rule-based inference method to test their performance on miRNA-disease association predictions with the similarity measurements. Comprehensive comparison is made based on leave-one-out cross-validations and a case study. Experimental results demonstrate that the similarity measurement using MeSH terms performs best among the 5 measurements. It should be noted that the other 4 measurements can also achieve reliable prediction performance. The best-performed similarity measurement is used for new miRNA-disease association predictions and the inferred results are released for further biomedical screening.

conclusionsOur study suggests that all the 5 features, even though some are restricted by data availability, are useful information for inferring novel miRNA-disease associations. However, biased prediction results might be produced in GO- and MeSH-based similarity measurements due to incomplete feature spaces. Similarity fusion may help produce more reliable prediction results. We expect that future studies will provide more detailed information into the 5 feature spaces and widen our understanding about disease pathogenesis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersComputational BiologyDiseaseGene OntologyHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisBiomarkersMicroRNAsmiRNA-disease associationPerformance evaluationSimilarity measurement

Identifiers

PMID32366225
PMCPMC7199309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.