Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366223›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Day centres for older people - attender characteristics, access routes and outcomes of regular attendance: findings of exploratory mixed methods case study research.

Katharine Orellana, Jill Manthorpe, Anthea Tinker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Older people's day centres' preventive work: views of day centre providers and their stakeholders.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  6. Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Age-Friendly Community Interventions for Health and Social Outcomes: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Life Conditions as Mediators of Welfare State Effect on Mental Wellbeing among Oldest Old in Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people.Journal of social work (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katharine OrellanaNIHR Policy Research Unit on Health and Social Care Research, The Policy Institute, King's College London, Strand Campus, London, WC2R 2LS, UK. Katharine.e.orellana@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-3706
Jill ManthorpeNIHR Policy Research Unit on Health and Social Care Research, The Policy Institute, King's College London, Strand Campus, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-1410
Anthea TinkerInstitute of Gerontology, King's College London, Strand Campus, Strand Campus, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0305-7198

Funding

Dunhill Medical Trust RTF59/0114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial prescribing is encouraged to promote well-being, reduce isolation and loneliness. Traditional, generalist day centres for older people could be suggested by social prescribing, but little is known about their clientele or their outcomes. As part of a larger study of the role, outcomes and commissioning of generalist English day centres for older people, the characteristics of attenders at 4 day centres, their reasons for attendance and outcomes were explored.

methodsThis mixed-methods study used qualitative interviews and standardised tools within an embedded multiple-case study design. Semi-structured interviews with older day centre attenders (n = 23, 62% of eligible attenders) of 4 day centres in south-east England, recruited purposively to reflect organisational differences, were analysed.

resultsParticipants reported non-elective withdrawal from socialisation following health or mobility decline, or losses. Apart from living arrangements and marital status, attenders' profiles differed between centres. Access had been mostly facilitated by others. Day centre attendance enhanced quality of life for this group of socially isolated people with mobility restrictions and at risk of declining independence and wellbeing. The positive impact on attenders' social participation and involvement and on meaningful occupation was significant (p-value < 0.001, 99% CI), with an average ASCOT gain score of 0.18. Ten outcome themes were identified.

conclusionOutcomes of day centre attendance are those targeted by social care and health policy. Centres were communities that 'enabled' and offset loss or isolation, thus supporting ageing in place through wellbeing and contributed something unique to their attenders' lives. By monitoring attenders' health and wellbeing and providing practical support, information and facilitating access to other services, centres offered added value. Attendance needs to be set in the context of other social engagement and care provision which may not overlap or duplicate centre support. Professionals may wish to explore the benefits of social prescriptions to day centres but should map local centres' provision, engage with their organisers, and seek information on attenders, who may differ from those in this study.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSocial SupportAdult Day Care CentersAgedAged, 80 and overAgingEnglandFemaleFrailtyHumansLonelinessMaleSocial IsolationAgeingDay centresFrailty indexGroup activityOlder peopleOutcomesSocial isolationSocial prescriptionSocial support

Identifiers

PMID32366223
PMCPMC7197165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.