ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Integrated Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Models for Standardizing Radiotherapy Structure Names.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Improving Hospital Length of Stay Prediction through Heterogeneous Data Integration from MIMIC-III Records.Research square · 2025Article
- Leveraging Radiotherapy Data for Precision Oncology: Veterans Affairs Granular Radiotherapy Information Database.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Enhancing Healthcare Data Integration: A Machine Learning Approach to Harmonizing Laboratory Labels.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Integrating natural language processing into radiation oncology: a practical guide to transformer architecture and large language models.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Fine-tuning a local LLaMA-3 large language model for automated privacy-preserving physician letter generation in radiation oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Artificial general intelligence for radiation oncology.Meta-radiology · 2023Article
- Infrastructure tools to support an effective Radiation Oncology Learning Health System.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based classification of organs at risk and delineation guideline in pelvic cancer radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Standardising Breast Radiotherapy Structure Naming Conventions: A Machine Learning Approach.Cancers · 2023Article
- Systematic tissue annotations of genomics samples by modeling unstructured metadata.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Assessment of Electronic Health Record for Cancer Research and Patient Care Through a Scoping Review of Cancer Natural Language Processing.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2022Article
- Deep learning-based classification and structure name standardization for organ at risk and target delineations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Automated data abstraction for quality surveillance and outcome assessment in radiation oncology.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Article
- Incorporating Patient Similarity and Clinical Temporality in Disease Prognostic Modeling.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of standardized structure names in radiotherapy (RT) data limits interoperability, data sharing, and the ability to perform big data analysis. To standardize radiotherapy structure names, we developed an integrated natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) based system that can map the physician-given structure names to American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 263 (TG-263) standard names. The dataset consist of 794 prostate and 754 lung cancer patients across the 40 different radiation therapy centers managed by the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Additionally, data from the Radiation Oncology department at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) was collected to serve as a test set. Domain experts identified as anatomically significant nine prostate and ten lung organs-at-risk (OAR) structures and manually labeled them according to the TG-263 standards, and remaining structures were labeled as Non_OAR. We experimented with six different classification algorithms and three feature vector methods, and the final model was built with fastText algorithm. Multiple validation techniques are used to assess the robustness of the proposed methodology. The macro-averaged F 1 score was used as the main evaluation metric. The model achieved an F 1 score of 0.97 on prostate structures and 0.99 for lung structures from the VA dataset. The model also performed well on the test (VCU) dataset, achieving an F 1 score of 0.93 for prostate structures and 0.95 on lung structures. In this work, we demonstrate that NLP and ML based approaches can used to standardize the physician-given RT structure names with high fidelity. This standardization can help with big data analytics in the radiation therapy domain using population-derived datasets, including standardization of the treatment planning process, clinical decision support systems, treatment quality improvement programs, and hypothesis-driven clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.