Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365928›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Effect of Research Impact on Emerging Camel Husbandry, Welfare and Social-Related Awareness.

Carlos Iglesias Pastrana, Francisco Javier Navas González, Elena Ciani, Cecilio José Barba Capote, Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A century of "Camel Research": a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Camel (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of parasitic diseases on dromedary camel (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  8. Recent progress in camel research.Open veterinary journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Iglesias PastranaDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
Francisco Javier Navas GonzálezDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
Elena CianiDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', 70121 Bari, Italy.
Cecilio José Barba CapoteDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
Juan Vicente Delgado BermejoDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
University of Córdoba · ESUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

ARIMNet2 (Coordination of Agricultural Research in the Mediterranean) APCIN-2016-00011-00-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of applied scientific research on camels, despite them being recognized as production animals, compels the reorganization of emerging camel breeding systems with the aim of achieving successful camel welfare management strategies all over the world. Relevant and properly-framed research widely impacts dissemination of scientific contents and drives public willingness to enhance ethically acceptable conditions for domestic animals. Consumer perception of this livestock industry will improve and high-quality products will be obtained. This paper draws on bibliometric indicators as promoting factors for camel-related research advances, tracing historical scientific publications indexed in ScienceDirect directory from 1880-2019. Camel as a species did not affect Journal Citation Reports (JCR) impact (

Indexed as

animal welfarebibliometricscamelsemerging industryinternational researchlaw enforcementscience–society dialogue

Identifiers

PMID32365928
PMCPMC7277471
OpenAlexW3022702282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.