Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365815›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Looking at Fog Computing for E-Health through the Lens of Deployment Challenges and Applications.

Pedro H Vilela, Joel J P C Rodrigues, Rodrigo da R Righi, Sergei Kozlov, Vinicius F Rodrigues

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Challenges in the Adoption of eHealth and mHealth for Adult Mental Health Management-Evidence from Romania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pedro H VilelaNational Institute of Telecommunications, Santa Rita do Sapucaí, MG 37540-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-0518
Joel J P C RodriguesFederal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI 64049-550, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8657-3800
Rodrigo da R RighiApplied Computing Graduate Program, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Unisinos, São Leopoldo, RS 93022-750, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5080-7660
Sergei KozlovInternational Institute of Photonics and Optoinformatics, ITMO University, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Vinicius F RodriguesApplied Computing Graduate Program, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Unisinos, São Leopoldo, RS 93022-750, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6129-0548

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Grant No. 431726/2018-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Grants No. 309335/2017-5FCT/MCTES Project UIDB/EEA/50008/2020Government of the Russian Federation Grant 08-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fog computing is a distributed infrastructure where specific resources are managed at the network border using cloud computing principles and technologies. In contrast to traditional cloud computing, fog computing supports latency-sensitive applications with less energy consumption and a reduced amount of data traffic. A fog device is placed at the network border, allowing data collection and processing to be physically close to their end-users. This characteristic is essential for applications that can benefit from improved latency and response time. In particular, in the e-Health field, many solutions rely on real-time data to monitor environments, patients, and/or medical staff, aiming at improving processes and safety. Therefore, fog computing can play an important role in such environments, providing a low latency infrastructure. The main goal of the current research is to present fog computing strategies focused on electronic-Health (e-Health) applications. To the best of our knowledge, this article is the first to propose a review in the scope of applications and challenges of e-Health fog computing. We introduce some of the available e-Health solutions in the literature that focus on latency, security, privacy, energy efficiency, and resource management techniques. Additionally, we discuss communication protocols and technologies, detailing both in an architectural overview from the edge devices up to the cloud. Differently from traditional cloud computing, the fog concept demonstrates better performance in terms of time-sensitive requirements and network data traffic. Finally, based on the evaluation of the current technologies for e-Health, open research issues and challenges are identified, and further research directions are proposed.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingLensesTelemedicineHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPrivacycloud computinge-healthfog computinghealthcareInternet of Things

Identifiers

PMID32365815
PMCPMC7248890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.