ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Visual Feedback and Postural Control in Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Learning Beyond the Clinic: Can Point of Choice Visual Feedback Prompts Elicit Motor Behavior Changes in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis?Research square · 2026Article
- Increased visual reliance for postural control in multiple sclerosis: preliminary evidence from task-related cortical desynchronization.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Digital Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- New methods of posturographic data analysis may improve the diagnostic value of static posturography in multiple sclerosis.Heliyon · 2021Article
- The Dresden Protocol for Multidimensional Walking Assessment (DMWA) in Clinical Practice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression?Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) manifest heterogeneous demyelinating lesions that could affect somatosensory or vestibular ways, visual stimulus as feedback could be especially relevant to achieve postural control. This has clinical importance for the development of preventive measures and rehabilitation therapies in order to avoid falls and accidents in this group. In our study, we objectively evaluated the influence of visual feedback on the stabilization of balance in pwMS versus healthy controls (HC) and its potential utility in clinical evaluation. Static posturography tests were performed in 99 pwMS and 30 HC. Subjects stood on a force platform with open and closed eyes. During this procedure, three balance parameters were obtained for both vision conditions: average sway, average speed, and average speed of sway. Neurostatus-Expanded Disease Disability Score (EDSS) and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) were performed in parallel as well. A two-way mixed repeated measures ANCOVA, controlling for sex and age, was performed to evaluate the effect of vision, MS diagnosis, and the interaction of both in static posturography parameters. The difference between both closed and open eyes conditions was calculated for each parameter and further analyzed according to MS-relevant clinical variables. The magnitude of the vision effect differed between pwMS and HC as a significant interaction between the vision and the MS diagnosis in the delineated area (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.