Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365602›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Government Expenditure on Maternal Health and Family Planning Services for Adolescents in Mexico, 2003-2015.

Leticia Avila-Burgos, Julio César Montañez-Hernández, Lucero Cahuana-Hurtado, Aremis Villalobos, Patricia Hernández-Peña, Ileana Heredia-Pi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Relegated Goal of Health Institutions: Sexual and Reproductive Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Leticia Avila-BurgosCenter for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8292-7103
Julio César Montañez-HernándezCenter for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9285-9928
Lucero Cahuana-HurtadoSchool of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima 15102, Peru.
Aremis VillalobosCenter for Population Health Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico.
Patricia Hernández-PeñaNetherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute-KNAW, University of Groningen, 2511 CV The Hague, The Netherlands.
Ileana Heredia-PiCenter for Health Systems Research, The National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-9239
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess whether government policies to expand the coverage of maternal health and family planning (MHFP) services were benefiting the adolescents in need. To this end, we estimated government MHFP expenditure for 10- to 19-year-old adolescents without social security (SS) coverage between 2003 and 2015. We evaluated its evolution and distribution nationally and sub-nationally by level of marginalization, as well as its relationship with demand indicators. Using Jointpoint regressions, we estimated the average annual percent change (AAPC) nationally and among states. Expenditure for adolescents without SS coverage registered 15% for AAPC for the period 2003-2011 and was stable for the remaining years, with 88% of spending allocated to maternal health. Growth in MHFP expenditure reduced the ratio of spending by 13% among groups of states with greater/lesser marginalization; nonetheless, the poorest states continued to show the lowest levels of expenditure. Although adolescents without SS coverage benefited from greater MHFP expenditure as a consequence of health policies directed at achieving universal health coverage, gaps persisted in its distribution among states, since those with similar demand indicators exhibited different levels of expenditure. Further actions are required to improve resource allocation to disadvantaged states and to reinforce the use of FP services by adolescents.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentHealth ExpendituresAdolescentChildFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesMexicoPregnancyYoung Adultadolescentsfamily planninggovernment health expenditurematernal health

Identifiers

PMID32365602
PMCPMC7246577
OpenAlexW3020937728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.