ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Nanocellulose-Based Inks for 3D Bioprinting: Key Aspects in Research Development and Challenging Perspectives in Applications-A Mini Review.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopolymer-Nanoparticle Interactions in 3D-Printing for Biomedical Applications: Advantages, Limitations and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2026Review
- Mechanobiology-based strategies for the maturation of biofabricated cartilage constructs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- 3D Nanofibrillar Matrix Stiffness Modulates Extracellular Vesicle Cargo and Pro-Tumour Functions.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
- 3D bio-printed scaffolds and smart implants: evaluating functional performance in animal surgery models.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Biofabrication of HepG2 Cells-Laden 3D Structures Using Nanocellulose-Reinforced Gelatin-Based Hydrogel Bioinks: Materials Characterization, Cell Viability Assessment, and Metabolomic Analysis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- New 3D Ink Formulation Comprising a Nanocellulose Aerogel Based on Electrostatic Repulsion and Sol-Gel Transition.Polymers · 2025Article
- All-Cellulose Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for the Versatile 3D Bioprinting of Different Cell Lines.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Trends in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Scaffolds Bioink for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.Food science of animal resources · 2025Review
- The Development of a Bacterial Nanocellulose/Cationic Starch Hydrogel for the Production of Sustainable 3D-Printed Packaging Foils.Polymers · 2024Article
- Exploring the evolution of bacterial cellulose precursors and their potential use as cellulose-based building blocks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of a Chimeric Resilin-Elastin Structural Protein Dedicated to 3D Bioprinting as a Bioink Component.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hydrogel-mediated extracellular vesicles for enhanced wound healing: the latest progress, and their prospects for 3D bioprinting.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Nanocellulose, the Green Biopolymer Trending in Pharmaceuticals: A Patent Review.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Rheology in Product Development: An Insight into 3D Printing of Hydrogels and Aerogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Printed Cellulose for Wound Dressing Applications.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Photocross-Linkable and Shape-Memory Biomaterial Hydrogel Based on Methacrylated Cellulose Nanofibres.Biomacromolecules · 2023Article
- Boosting functional properties of active-CMC films reinforced with agricultural residues-derived cellulose nanofibres.RSC advances · 2023Article
- 3D double-reinforced graphene oxide - nanocellulose biomaterial inks for tissue engineered constructs.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Development of an All-Marine 3D Printed Bioactive Hydrogel Dressing for Treatment of Hard-to-Heal Wounds.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanocelluloses have emerged as a catalogue of renewable nanomaterials for bioink formulation in service of 3D bioprinting, thanks to their structural similarity to extracellular matrices and excellent biocompatibility of supporting crucial cellular activities. From a material scientist's viewpoint, this mini-review presents the key research aspects of the development of the nanocellulose-based bioinks in 3D (bio)printing. The nanomaterial properties of various types of nanocelluloses, including bacterial nanocellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose nanocrystals, are reviewed with respect to their origins and preparation methods. Different cross-linking strategies to integrate into multicomponent nanocellulose-based bioinks are discussed in terms of regulating ink fidelity in direct ink writing as well as tuning the mechanical stiffness as a bioactive cue in the printed hydrogel construct. Furthermore, the impact of surface charge and functional groups on nanocellulose surface on the crucial cellular activities (e.g., cell survival, attachment, and proliferation) is discussed with the cell-matrix interactions in focus. Aiming at a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for end-users in biomedical and pharmaceutical fields, challenging aspects such as biodegradability and potential nanotoxicity of nanocelluloses call for more fundamental comprehension of the cell-matrix interactions and further validation in in vivo models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.