Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365539›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Landscape of Anthrax Prevention and Control: Stakeholders' Perceptive in Odisha, India.

Krushna Chandra Sahoo, Sapna Negi, Deepika Barla, Goldi Badaik, Sunita Sahoo, Madhusmita Bal, Arun Kumar Padhi, Sanghamitra Pati, Debdutta Bhattacharya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anthrax: A narrative review.New microbes and new infections · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Anthrax outbreak in Odisha, India: past, present, and future.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krushna Chandra SahooRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.
Sapna NegiRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.
Deepika BarlaRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.
Goldi BadaikRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.
Sunita SahooRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.
Madhusmita BalRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.
Arun Kumar PadhiDistrict Headquarter Hospital, Koraput, Odisha 764020, India.
Sanghamitra PatiRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.
Debdutta BhattacharyaRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751023, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-5288
Indian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and outbreaks of anthrax are interlinked with the animal-environment-human context, which signifies the need for collaborative, trans-disciplinary and multi-sectoral approaches for the prevention and control of anthrax. In India, there are hardly any shreds of evidence on the role of various stakeholders' on anthrax prevention and control. Therefore, this study addressed the experiences of various stakeholders on anthrax prevention and control strategies in Odisha, India. A qualitative explorative study was carried out using 42 in-depth-interviews among the stakeholders from health, veterinary and general administrative departments from the block, district, and state level. Two major themes emerged: (1) Epidemiological investigation of anthrax in Odisha, India, and (2) Biological and social prevention strategies for anthrax in Odisha, India. The study emphasizes setting up the surveillance system as per standard guideline, and strengthening the diagnostic facility at a regional medical college laboratory to avoid delay. Moreover, it emphasizes step-up inter-sectoral co-ordination, collaboration and sensitization among health, veterinary, forestry, education, nutrition and tribal welfare departments at all levels in order to reduce the prevalence and control the outbreaks of anthrax in Odisha state. It also recommends raising community literacy, in particular on safe carcass disposal, changing behavior on dead-livestock consumption, and compliance with livestock vaccinations.

Indexed as

AnthraxAnimalsDisease OutbreaksHumansIndiaLivestockQualitative Researchanthraxone-health conceptstakeholdersveterinary diseaseszoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID32365539
PMCPMC7246808
OpenAlexW3021083328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.