Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365471›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Antibiotics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Top 100 Classics.

Anas Imran Arshad, Paras Ahmad, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Jawaad Ahmed Asif, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Zuliani Mahmood, Normastura Abd Rahman, Noraida Mamat, Mohammad Amjad Kamal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Global trends of dalbavancin: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Current Status and Trends in Research on Caries Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of the Most-Cited Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis in Acupuncture Research.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anas Imran ArshadPaediatric Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8318-5546
Paras AhmadOral Medicine Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7306-9795
Mohmed Isaqali KarobariConservative Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-9695
Jawaad Ahmed AsifOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Mohammad Khursheed AlamOrthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72721, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-1752
Zuliani MahmoodPaediatric Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Normastura Abd RahmanDental Public Health Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia.
Noraida MamatPaediatric Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Mohammad Amjad KamalKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0088-0565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citation frequencies represent the most significant contributions in any respective field. This bibliometric analysis aimed to identify and analyze the 100 most-cited publications in the field of antibiotics and to highlight the trends of research in this field. "All databases" of Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science was used to identify and analyze the 100 publications. The articles were then cross-matched with Scopus and Google Scholar. The frequency of citation ranged from 940 to 11,051 for the Web of Science, 1053 to 10,740 for Scopus, and 1162 to 20,041 for Google Scholar. A total of 513 authors made contributions to the ranked list, and Robert E.W. Hancock contributed in six articles, which made it to the ranked list. Sixty-six scientific contributions originated from the United States of America. Five publications were linked to the University of Manitoba, Canada, that was identified as the educational organization, made the most contributions (

Indexed as

antibacterialantibioticsantimicrobialsbibliometric analysiscitation classicstop-cited articles

Identifiers

PMID32365471
PMCPMC7277750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.