Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365232›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2020

On using electronic health records to improve optimal treatment rules in randomized trials.

Peng Wu, Donglin Zeng, Haoda Fu, Yuanjia Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multiple domain and multiple kernel outcome-weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment regimes.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peng WuDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0843-9280
Haoda FuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Yuanjia WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-3315

Funding

Statistical Methods for Integrating Mixed-type Biomarkers and Phenotypes in Neurodegenerative Disease ModelingR01NS073671 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2011 to 2025
$3.9M
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Integrative Learning to Combine Evidence for Personalized Treatment Strategies.R21MH117458 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2018 to 2019
$446k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH117458NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) tailor medical treatments according to patient-specific characteristics in order to optimize patient outcomes. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are used to infer valid ITRs using statistical and machine learning methods. However, RCTs are usually conducted under specific inclusion/exclusion criteria, thus limiting their generalizability to a broader patient population in real-world practice settings. Because electronic health records (EHRs) document treatment prescriptions in the real world, transferring information in EHRs to RCTs, if done appropriately, could potentially improve the performance of ITRs, in terms of precision and generalizability. In this work, we propose a new domain adaptation method to learn ITRs by incorporating information from EHRs. Unless we assume that there is no unmeasured confounding in EHRs, we cannot directly learn the optimal ITR from the combined EHR and RCT data. Instead, we first pretrain "super" features from EHRs that summarize physician treatment decisions and patient observed benefits in the real world, as these are likely to be informative of the optimal ITRs. We then augment the feature space of the RCT and learn the optimal ITRs by stratifying by super features using subjects enrolled in RCT. We adopt Q-learning and a modified matched-learning algorithm for estimation. We present heuristic justification of our method and conduct simulation studies to demonstrate the performance of super features. Finally, we apply our method to transfer information learned from EHRs of patients with type 2 diabetes to learn individualized insulin therapies from RCT data.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Designdomain adaptationmachine learningmatchingpersonalized medicinereal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID32365232
PMCPMC7786287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.