ArticlePloS one2020
Evaluation of the optical performance for aspheric intraocular lenses in relation with tilt and decenter errors.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Interventional Study to Evaluate the Effect of Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Centration and Tilt on Visual Performance.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical and simulated impact of intraocular lens tilt and decentration based on real-world data and optical simulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Basic Optics Underlying Current Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Real-World Visual and Refractive Results of Two Different Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical impact of intraocular lens tilt and decentration: a cross-sectional study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Effects of capsulorhexis size and position on post-surgical IOL alignment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Assessment of intraocular lens tilt and decentration after femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgery at 12 months and beyond.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Through-focus performance and off-axis effects in aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Effect of Decentration, Rotation, and Tilt on Objective Optical Quality of Plate Haptic Toric Intraocular Lenses in the Early Postoperative Period.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Observational
- Outcomes of Secondary Intracapsular Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of the optical behaviour of five different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses in a model eye.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the mechanical stability of intraocular lenses using digital image correlation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Influence of decentration and tilt of Tecnis ZCB00 on visual acuity and higher order aberrations.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Tilt and decentration with various intraocular lenses: A narrative review.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Effect of decentration, tilt and rotation on the optical quality of various toric intraocular lens designs: a numerical and experimental study.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Decentration, Tilt and Angular Orientation of Toric Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Effect of Intraocular Lens Tilt and Decentration on Visual Acuity, Dysphotopsia and Wavefront Aberrations.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Short-time evaluation on intraocular scattering after implantable collamer lens implantation for correcting high myopia.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Misalignment and tilt effect on aspheric intraocular lens designs after a corneal refractive surgery.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate and compare the effect of misalignment and tilt on the optical performance of different aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) designs.
methodsThree aspheric IOLs with a different quantity of spherical aberration (SA) have been designed and the effect of IOL misalignment and tilt on the imaging quality of an eye model has been numerically assessed using a commercial optical design software. The prototypes have been manufactured by lathe turning and tested in vitro using the same optical bench (PMTF, Lambda-X) that complies with International Organization for Standardization standard 11979-2 requirements. Image quality was evaluated from the modulation transfer functions (MTFs), through-focus modulation transfer functions (TF-MTFs), root mean square (RMS) values of defocus, astigmatism and coma, and images of the United States Air Force (USAF) target were taken. A comparison with the optical performance of spherical IOLs has also been performed.
resultsIntraocular lens misalignment and tilt increased wavefront aberrations; the effect of misalignment on root mean square (RMS) astigmatism and coma was positively correlated with the spherical aberration of the IOL. Aberration-free IOLs showed the highest MTF for all misalignment values and for IOLs with negative SA correction the MTF decays below 0.43 when they are decentered 0.50 mm.
conclusionsAspherical IOLs are more sensitive than spherical IOLs to misalignment or tilt, depending on their SA correction. The optical degradation caused by IOL misalignment had a greater effect on IOL designs with a higher amount of negative spherical aberration. In contrast, the effect of tilt on the optical performance was less sensitive to the IOL design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.