Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365134›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Does the 6-minute walk test in hospitalized COPD patients exclusively correlate with lung function parameters or should psychological factors also be taken into account?

Michèle Borgmann, Martina Ivanda, Yalda Hadizamani, Markus Mohaupt, Robert Bals, Rudolf Lucas, Jürg Hamacher, Volker Köllner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. First results from post-COVID inpatient rehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Michèle BorgmannInternal Medicine and Pneumology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Martina IvandaMediClin Rose Clinic, Horn-Bad Meinberg, Germany.
Yalda HadizamaniInternal Medicine and Pneumology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-4912
Markus MohauptInternal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Robert BalsInternal Medicine V-Pneumology, Allergology, Respiratory and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Rudolf LucasLungen- und Atmungsstiftung Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jürg HamacherInternal Medicine and Pneumology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Volker KöllnerDepartment of Behavioral Therapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Rehabilitation Center Seehof, Federal German Pension Agency, Teltow, Germany.
Lindenhofspital · CHAugusta University · USKlinik für Psychosomatik · DEKlinik Sonnenhof · CHSaarland University · DE

Funding

ENaC-α mediates lung fluid clearance and capillary barrier function in pneumoniaR01HL138410 · NHLBI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI LUCAS, RUDOLF · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL138410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 6-minute walk test is generally considered a standard test for the evaluation of short-term maximal physical performance. It has not been evaluated whether psychological factors, such as anxiety or depression, affect the performance or the results of the test. The main aim of this study was to investigate whether a correlation exists between psychological factors and the data from the 6-minute walking test. The study cohort consisted of 85 (♀ = 34 and ♂ = 51) 66 ± 10 (mean ± SD) year-old patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) hospitalized for disease exacerbation. Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1) (% predicted) as predictor for lung function, as well as anxiety and depression symptoms assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as psychological predictors were collected. Bivariate correlations and hierarchical linear regression models were used to analyse the correlations. Walking distance was on average 260m ± 107m and ranged from 64m to 480m. HADS was negatively correlated with 6-min walking distance (r = 0.441, p = .0009, r = -.523, p = 00006). Hierarchical linear regression showed that FEV1 alone explained 33%, and together with the psychological variables anxiety and depression explained 42% of the variance of results from the 6-minute walking test. These findings demonstrated that 11% of the data correlated with the psychological variables alone (p = .011). The effect size for lung function (f2 = .717) and psychological variables (f2 = .352) were high, whereas the socio-demographic variables sex, age, educational level and BMI could not explain any additional variance in our cohort. In conclusion, our study indicates that psychological factors such as symptoms of depression and anxiety are associated with lower physical functional performance in the 6-minute walking test. As such, these factors should also be assessed. Future research is needed to show if treatments of anxiety and depression can improve the walking distance in COPD patients.

Indexed as

Exercise ToleranceRespiratory Function TestsWalk TestAgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHospitalizationHumansInpatientsLungMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveVital Capacity

Identifiers

PMID32365134
PMCPMC7197854
OpenAlexW3022254669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.