Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Facilitators and challenges to exclusive breastfeeding in Belagavi District, Karnataka, India.

Umesh Charantimath, Roopa Bellad, Niranjana Majantashetti, Yukiko Washio, Richard Derman, Patricia J Kelly, Vanessa Short, Esther Chung, Shivaprasad Goudar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03533725 (Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03533725 nacompletednot on this map

Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled247ConditionsBreastfeedingArmsBreastfeeding counseling and education services
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of an mHealth supported breastfeeding peer counselor intervention in rural India.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Umesh CharantimathJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Roopa BelladJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Niranjana MajantashettiJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Yukiko WashioRTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Richard DermanThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Patricia J KellyUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8143-7153
Vanessa ShortThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Esther ChungThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shivaprasad GoudarJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-7053
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College · INThomas Jefferson University · USRTI International · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby (BEST4Baby)R21TW010609 · FIC · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DERMAN, RICHARD J · 2018 to 2019
$370k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW010609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA primary objective of this study was to identify specific facilitators and challenges around exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in our community in India, from the perspective of breastfeeding mothers and their support networks.

methodsWe conducted eight focus groups incorporating 75 women and their support networks in the Belagavi District, Karnataka State, India. We used a directed content analysis to guide the analysis.

resultsThe specific facilitator that emerged as a theme, broad support for and knowledge about breastfeeding on the individual, family and community levels, was a seeming contraction to the identified specific challenge, the paradox of the common practice of supplemental feeds.

conclusionsDespite voicing strong support for and knowledge about EBF, participants were familiar with a variety of supplemental feeding practices in their communities. In place of universal condemnation of all supplemental feeding, policy makers might consider strategies to address the most potentially dangerous of these practices.

Indexed as

Psychosocial Support SystemsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBreast FeedingEducational StatusFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMothersRegistriesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32365108
PMCPMC7197767
OpenAlexW3021389604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.