Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365097›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

A phase 2, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose‑ranging study of the efficacy and safety of Astodrimer Gel for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.

Arthur S Waldbaum, Jane R Schwebke, Jeremy R A Paull, Clare F Price, Stephanie R Edmondson, Alex Castellarnau, Philip McCloud, George R Kinghorn

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Astodrimer sodium and bacterial vaginosis: a mini review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial of Astodrimer 1% Gel for preventing recurrent bacterial vaginosis.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Arthur S WaldbaumDowntown Women's Health Care, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Jane R SchwebkeDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Jeremy R A PaullStarpharma Pty Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-421X
Clare F PriceStarpharma Pty Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephanie R EdmondsonStarpharma Pty Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alex CastellarnauStarpharma Pty Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Philip McCloudMcCloud Consulting Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
George R KinghornRoyal Hallamshire and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Starpharma (Australia) · AUDowntown Women's Health Care · USRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAstodrimer Gel contains a novel dendrimer intended to treat and prevent bacterial vaginosis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of Astodrimer Gel for treatment of bacterial vaginosis.

methods132 women with bacterial vaginosis were randomized 1:1:1:1 to Astodrimer 0.5% (N = 34), 1% (N = 33), or 3% (N = 32) Gel or hydroxyethyl cellulose placebo gel (N = 33) at a dose of 5 g vaginally once daily for 7 days at 6 centers in the United States. The primary endpoint was clinical cure (no bacterial vaginosis vaginal discharge and no more than one of 1) vaginal pH ≥4.5; 2) ≥20% clue cells; or 3) positive whiff test) at study days 21-30. Secondary analyses included clinical cure at study days 9-12, patient-reported symptoms, acceptability and adverse events.

resultsThe Astodrimer 1% Gel dose was superior to placebo for the primary and selected secondary efficacy measures in the modified intent-to-treat population. Clinical cure rates at day 9-12 were superior to placebo for the Astodrimer 3%, 1% and 0.5% Gel groups (62.5% [15/24; P = .002], 74.1% [20/27; P < .001], and 55.2% [16/29; P = .001], respectively, vs. 22.2% [6/27]). At day 21-30, clinical cure rates were 46.2% (12/26) for the 1% dose vs. 11.5% for placebo (3/26; P = .006). A greater proportion of patients reported absence of vaginal discharge and vaginal odor at day 9-12 and day 21-30 for Astodrimer Gel groups compared with placebo. Adverse events considered potentially treatment-related occurred in only 25% of Astodrimer Gel-treated patients vs. 22% of placebo patients.

conclusionAstodrimer Gel once daily for 7 days was superior to placebo for treatment of bacterial vaginosis and was well-tolerated. The 1% dose consistently showed the strongest efficacy across endpoints. These results support a role for Astodrimer Gel, 1%, as an effective treatment for bacterial vaginosis.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDendrimersDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGelsHumansPolylysineTreatment OutcomeVaginal DischargeVaginosis, BacterialYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsastodrimerDendrimersGelsPolylysine

Identifiers

PMID32365097
PMCPMC7197797
OpenAlexW3023349002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.