Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32365065›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Effect of protein aggregation in wheat-legume mixed pasta diets on their in vitro digestion kinetics in comparison to "rapid" and "slow" animal proteins.

Insaf Berrazaga, Claire Bourlieu-Lacanal, Karima Laleg, Julien Jardin, Valérie Briard-Bion, Didier Dupont, Stéphane Walrand, Valérie Micard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Insaf BerrazagaIATE Agropolymers Engineering and Emerging Technologies, Université Montpellier, CIRAD INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Claire Bourlieu-LacanalIATE Agropolymers Engineering and Emerging Technologies, Université Montpellier, CIRAD INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Karima LalegIATE Agropolymers Engineering and Emerging Technologies, Université Montpellier, CIRAD INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Julien JardinUMR 1253 STLO Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'Œuf, Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, Rennes, France.
Valérie Briard-BionUMR 1253 STLO Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'Œuf, Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, Rennes, France.
Didier DupontUMR 1253 STLO Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'Œuf, Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, Rennes, France.
Stéphane WalrandUNH, Unité de Nutrition Humaine, CRNH, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Valérie MicardIATE Agropolymers Engineering and Emerging Technologies, Université Montpellier, CIRAD INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5193-9136
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of incorporating different legume flours (faba bean, lentil or split pea flours) on the pasta protein network and its repercussion on in vitro protein digestibility, in comparison with reference dairy proteins. Kinetics and yields of protein hydrolysis in legume enriched pasta and, for the first time, the peptidomes generated by the pasta at the end of the in vitro gastric and intestinal phases of digestion are presented. Three isoproteic (21%) legume enriched pasta with balanced essential amino acids, were made from wheat semolina and 62% to 79% of legume flours (faba bean or F-pasta; lentil or L-pasta and split pea or P-pasta). Pasta were prepared following the conventional pastification steps (hydration, mixing, extrusion, drying, cooking). Amino acid composition and protein network structure of the pasta were determined along with their culinary and rheological properties and residual trypsin inhibitor activity (3-5% of the activity initially present in raw legume flour). F- and L-pasta had contrasted firmness and proportion of covalently linked proteins. F-pasta had a generally weaker protein network and matrix structure, however far from the weakly linked soluble milk proteins (SMP) and casein proteins, which in addition contained no antitrypsin inhibitors and more theoretical cleavage sites for digestive enzymes. The differences in protein network reticulation between the different pasta and between pasta and dairy proteins were in agreement in each kinetic phase with the yield of the in vitro protein hydrolysis, which reached 84% for SMP, and 66% for casein at the end of intestinal phase, versus 50% for L- and P-pasta and 58% for F-pasta. The peptidome of legume enriched pasta is described for the first time and compared with the peptidome of dairy proteins for each phase of digestion. The gastric and intestinal phases were important stages of peptide differentiation between legumes and wheat. However, peptidome analysis revealed no difference in wheat-derived peptides in the three pasta diets regardless of the digestion phase, indicating that there was a low covalent interaction between wheat gluten and legume proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsCookingDietary ProteinsDigestionFabaceaeFlourFood, FortifiedHumansHydrolysisIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsLens PlantMilk ProteinsNutritive ValuePisum sativumPlant ProteinsDietary ProteinsMilk ProteinsPlant ProteinsProtein Aggregates

Identifiers

PMID32365065
PMCPMC7197814
OpenAlexW3020935456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.