ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Decoding the language of microbiomes using word-embedding techniques, and applications in inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-empowered human microbiome research.Gut · 2026Review
- The gut as a central hub for multi-organ crosstalk in aging.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Decoding the rhizosphere microbiome againstFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Decoding host-microbiome interactions through integrative multi-omics and artificial intelligence: from biological mechanisms to predictive modelling.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Learning a deep language model for microbiomes: The power of large scale unlabeled microbiome data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- DGCNN approach links metagenome-derived taxon and functional information providing insight into global soil organic carbon.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Review
- Deep learning methods in metagenomics: a review.Microbial genomics · 2024Review
- Discovering genomic islands in unannotated bacterial genomes using sequence embedding.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Methodological Considerations in Longitudinal Analyses of Microbiome Data: A Comprehensive Review.Genes · 2023Review
- Machine learning and deep learning applications in microbiome research.ISME communications · 2022Review
- Revealing General Patterns of Microbiomes That Transcend Systems: Potential and Challenges of Deep Transfer Learning.mSystems · 2022Article
- GMEmbeddings: An R Package to Apply Embedding Techniques to Microbiome Data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Compositional and genetic alterations in Graves' disease gut microbiome reveal specific diagnostic biomarkers.The ISME journal · 2021Article
- Gut microbiome-based supervised machine learning for clinical diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2021Article
- Inflammation-Associated Microbiota Composition Across Domestic Animals.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Correction: Decoding the language of microbiomes using word-embedding techniques, and applications in inflammatory bowel disease.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiomes are complex ecological systems that play crucial roles in understanding natural phenomena from human disease to climate change. Especially in human gut microbiome studies, where collecting clinical samples can be arduous, the number of taxa considered in any one study often exceeds the number of samples ten to one hundred-fold. This discrepancy decreases the power of studies to identify meaningful differences between samples, increases the likelihood of false positive results, and subsequently limits reproducibility. Despite the vast collections of microbiome data already available, biome-specific patterns of microbial structure are not currently leveraged to inform studies. Here, we derive microbiome-level properties by applying an embedding algorithm to quantify taxon co-occurrence patterns in over 18,000 samples from the American Gut Project (AGP) microbiome crowdsourcing effort. We then compare the predictive power of models trained using properties, normalized taxonomic count data, and another commonly used dimensionality reduction method, Principal Component Analysis in categorizing samples from individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and healthy controls. We show that predictive models trained using property data are the most accurate, robust, and generalizable, and that property-based models can be trained on one dataset and deployed on another with positive results. Furthermore, we find that properties correlate significantly with known metabolic pathways. Using these properties, we are able to extract known and new bacterial metabolic pathways associated with inflammatory bowel disease across two completely independent studies. By providing a set of pre-trained embeddings, we allow any V4 16S amplicon study to apply the publicly informed properties to increase the statistical power, reproducibility, and generalizability of analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.