Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32364754›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2020

Efficient and Accurate Extracting of Unstructured EHRs on Cancer Therapy Responses for the Development of RECIST Natural Language Processing Tools: Part I, the Corpus.

Yalun Li, Yung-Hung Luo, Jason A Wampfler, Samuel M Rubinstein, Firat Tiryaki, Kumar Ashok, Jeremy L Warner, Hua Xu, Ping Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yalun LiDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Yung-Hung LuoDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jason A WampflerDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Samuel M RubinsteinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Firat TiryakiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Kumar AshokDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Jeremy L WarnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Ping YangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.

Funding

ALPHA 1 AD CARRIERS AND LUNG CANCER RISKR01CA080127 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI YANG, PING · 2000 to 2009
$4.4M
Genetic Determinants of Lung Cancer SurvivalR01CA084354 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI YANG, PING · 2001 to 2012
$4.0M
Advancing Cancer Pharmacoepidemiology Research Through EHRs and InformaticsU24CA194215 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI, YANG, PING · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
VGM: Vanderbilt Genomic Medicine Training ProgramT32HG008341 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Nancy J Cox, Joseph F. Peterson · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
DEVELOPMENT OF LUNG CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY RESEARCHR03CA077118 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI YANG, PING · 1997 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA080127NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084354NCI NIH HHS R03 CA077118NCI NIH HHS U24 CA194215NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG008341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElectronic health records (EHRs) are created primarily for nonresearch purposes; thus, the amounts of data are enormous, and the data are crude, heterogeneous, incomplete, and largely unstructured, presenting challenges to effective analyses for timely, reliable results. Particularly, research dealing with clinical notes relevant to patient care and outcome is seldom conducted, due to the complexity of data extraction and accurate annotation in the past. RECIST is a set of widely accepted research criteria to evaluate tumor response in patients undergoing antineoplastic therapy. The aim for this study was to identify textual sources for RECIST information in EHRs and to develop a corpus of pharmacotherapy and response entities for development of natural language processing tools.

methodsWe focused on pharmacotherapies and patient responses, using 55,120 medical notes (n = 72 types) in Mayo Clinic's EHRs from 622 randomly selected patients who signed authorization for research. Using the Multidocument Annotation Environment tool, we applied and evaluated predefined keywords, and time interval and note-type filters for identifying RECIST information and established a gold standard data set for patient outcome research.

resultsKey words reduced clinical notes to 37,406, and using four note types within 12 months postdiagnosis further reduced the number of notes to 5,005 that were manually annotated, which covered 97.9% of all cases (n = 609 of 622). The resulting data set of 609 cases (n = 503 for training and n = 106 for validation purpose), contains 736 fully annotated, deidentified clinical notes, with pharmacotherapies and four response end points: complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease. This resource is readily expandable to specific drugs, regimens, and most solid tumors.

conclusionWe have established a gold standard data set to accommodate development of biomedical informatics tools in accelerating research into antineoplastic therapeutic response.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingNeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsHumansResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

Identifiers

PMID32364754
PMCPMC7265793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.