Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32364159›Full record

ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2020

Analysis of behavioral disability and construction of a disability scale for the elderly in Shanghai.

Zeguo Shao, Yuhong Xiang, Mina Yan, Wei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeguo ShaoShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yuhong XiangCenter for Intelligent Medical Electronics, School of Information Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mina YanCenter for Intelligent Medical Electronics, School of Information Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ChenShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the gradual aging of China's population development, the number of disabled elderly has increased significantly.

objectiveIn order to better solve the problem of life care for these elderly people, it is necessary to conduct in-depth and detailed research on the specific conditions of disabled elderly people, in order to differentiate different conditions for care and set appropriate insurance provisions.

methodsBased on the detailed analysis of the basic behavioral ability of the elderly, and referring to the International Disability standards, this paper refines the three basic living ability indicators of physiological behavior, cognitive behavior and interpersonal behavior, and integrates the cultural elements of assimilation, continuity, fusion and cohesion with Chinese characteristics. A more systematic and perfect five-level disability scale which conforms to the national conditions of China is designed.

resultsThe disability of the elderly in Shanghai was investigated with the newly constructed scale, and a detailed analysis and five-level division were made.

conclusionExperiments show that the results of this study can more effectively establish the disability level of the elderly in China.

Indexed as

CognitionPersons with DisabilitiesPhysical Functional PerformanceSocial BehaviorActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAgingChinaDisability EvaluationFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference StandardsBehavioral abilitydisability leveldisabled elderly

Identifiers

PMID32364159
PMCPMC7369048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.