ReviewNeurologia2020
Will neurological care change over the next 5 years due to the COVID-19 pandemic? Key informant consensus survey.
Review in Neurologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Acute stroke care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ictus Madrid Program recommendations.Neurologia · 2020Guideline
- [Adaptation of headache units in Andalusia to the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis of the Andalusian Neurology Society's Headache Study Group].Revista de neurologia · 2022Observational
- Neuropsychiatric Disorders and COVID-19: What We Know So Far.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Editorial: Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Care for Neurological Conditions.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- The role of scientific journal editors during the COVID-19 pandemic.Neurologia · 2020Article
- The epilepsy unit during the COVID-19 epidemic: The role of telemedicine and the effects of confinement on patients with epilepsy.Neurologia · 2020Article
- Observational
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the organisation of stroke care. Madrid Stroke Care Plan.NeurologiaArticle
- [Neurology residency training during the COVID-19 pandemic].Neurology perspectivesArticle
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic will give rise to long-term changes in neurological care, which are not easily predictable. MATERIAL AND
methodsA key informant survey was used to enquire about the changes expected in the specialty over the next 5 years. The survey was completed by heads of neurology departments with broad knowledge of the situation, having been active during the pandemic.
resultsDespite a low level of consensus between participants, there was strong (85%) and moderate consensus (70%) about certain subjects, mainly the increase in precautions to be taken, the use of telemedicine and teleconsultations, the reduction of care provided in in-person consultations to avoid the presence of large numbers of people in waiting rooms, the development of remote training solutions, and the changes in monitoring visits during clinical trials. There was consensus that there would be no changes to the indication of complementary testing or neurological examination.
conclusionThe key informant survey identified the foreseeable changes in neurological care after the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.