Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32363989›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Sex Differences in Symptom Presentation in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Roos E M van Oosterhout, Annemarijn R de Boer, Angela H E M Maas, Frans H Rutten, Michiel L Bots, Sanne A E Peters

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Absence of chest discomfort in type 1 NSTEMI patients: predictors and impact on outcome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roos E M van OosterhoutJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands.
Annemarijn R de BoerJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands.
Angela H E M MaasDepartment of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands.
Frans H RuttenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands.
Michiel L BotsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands.
Sanne A E PetersJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLGeorge Institute for Global Health · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014550/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Timely recognition of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is important for successful treatment. Previous research has suggested that women with ACS present with different symptoms compared with men. This review assessed the extent of sex differences in symptom presentation in patients with confirmed ACS. Methods and Results A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to June 2019. Two reviewers independently screened title-abstracts and full-texts according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI of a symptom being present were calculated using aggregated and cumulative meta-analyses as well as sex-specific pooled prevalences for each symptom. Twenty-seven studies were included. Compared with men, women with ACS had higher odds of presenting with pain between the shoulder blades (OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.95-2.37), nausea or vomiting (OR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.48-1.82) and shortness of breath (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.21-1.48). Women had lower odds of presenting with chest pain (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.78) and diaphoresis (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94). Both sexes presented most often with chest pain (pooled prevalences, men 79%; 95% CI, 72-85, pooled prevalences, women 74%; 95% CI, 72-85). Other symptoms also showed substantial overlap in prevalence. The presence of sex differences has been established since the early 2000s. Newer studies did not materially change cumulative findings. Conclusions Women with ACS do have different symptoms at presentation than men with ACS, but there is also considerable overlap. Since these differences have been shown for years, symptoms should no longer be labeled as "atypical" or "typical."

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSymptom AssessmentAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex Factorsacute coronary syndromediagnosismeta‐analysissex differencessymptomssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32363989
PMCPMC7428564
OpenAlexW3023550637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.