Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32363561›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2020

Ring models of binocular rivalry and fusion.

Ziqi Wang, Wei Dai, David W McLaughlin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. State-dependent filtering as a mechanism toward visual robustness.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ziqi WangIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, 3801 Rue Université, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Wei DaiNew York University - Courant Institute of Mathematical Science, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
David W McLaughlinNew York University - Courant Institute of Mathematical Science, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY, 10012, USA. david.mclaughlin@nyu.edu.
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When similar visual stimuli are presented binocularly to both eyes, one perceives a fused single image. However, when the two stimuli are distinct, one does not perceive a single image; instead, one perceives binocular rivalry. That is, one perceives one of the stimulated patterns for a few seconds, then the other for few seconds, and so on - with random transitions between the two percepts. Most theoretical studies focus on rivalry, with few considering the coexistence of fusion and rivalry. Here we develop three distinct computational neuronal network models which capture binocular rivalry with realistic stochastic properties, fusion, and the hysteretic transition between. Each is a conductance-based point neuron model, which is multi-layer with two ocular dominance columns (L & R) and with an idealized "ring" architecture where the orientation preference of each neuron labels its location on a ring. In each model, the primary mechanism initiating binocular rivalry is cross-column inhibition, with firing rate adaptation governing the temporal properties of the transitions between percepts. Under stimulation by similar visual patterns, each of three models uses its own mechanism to overcome cross-column inhibition, and thus to prevent rivalry and allow the fusion of similar images: The first model uses cross-column feedforward inhibition from the opposite eye to "shut off" the cross-column feedback inhibition; the second model "turns on" a second layer of monocular neurons as a parallel pathway to the binocular neurons, rivaling out of phase with the first layer, and together these two pathways represent fusion; and the third model uses cross-column excitation to overcome the cross-column inhibition and enable fusion. Thus, each of the idealized ring models depends upon a different mechanism for fusion that might emerge as an underlying mechanism present in real visual cortex.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDominance, OcularElectrophysiological PhenomenaFeedback, SensoryHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsN-MethylaspartateStochastic ProcessesVision, BinocularVision DisparityVisual PerceptionNeurotransmitter AgentsN-MethylaspartateBinocular rivalryComputational model neuronal networkFusion

Identifiers

PMID32363561
OpenAlexW3022973983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.