Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32363542›Full record

Observational studyPharmacoEconomics2020

Real-World Evidence on the Societal Economic Relapse Costs in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Nils-Henning Ness, Dirk Schriefer, Rocco Haase, Benjamin Ettle, Tjalf Ziemssen

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in PharmacoEconomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Productivity loss among people with early multiple sclerosis: A Canadian study.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nils-Henning NessMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk SchrieferMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Rocco HaaseMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Benjamin EttleNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.
Tjalf ZiemssenMS Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Tjalf.Ziemssen@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelapses are the hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS). Analyses have shown that the cost of MS increases during periods of relapse. However, results are inconsistent between studies, possibly due to different study designs and the different implications of relapses with respect to patient characteristics.

objectivesThe aims were to estimate and describe direct and indirect relapse costs and to determine differences in costs with respect to patient characteristics. Furthermore, we describe the pharmacoeconomic impact during the relapse follow-up.

methodsData were extracted from two German, multicenter, observational studies applying a validated resource costs instrument. Relapse costs were calculated as the difference in quarterly costs between propensity score (PS)-matched patients with and without relapses (1:1 ratio). For relapse active patients, we additionally calculated the difference between quarterly costs prior to and during relapse and determined costs in the post-relapse quarter.

resultsOf 1882 patients, 607 (32%) presented at least one relapse. After PS-matching, 597 relapse active and relapse inactive patients were retained. Relapse costs (in 2019 values) ranged between €791 (age 50 + years) and €1910 (disease duration < 5 years). In mildly disabled and recently diagnosed patients, indirect relapse costs (range €1073-€1207) constantly outweighed direct costs (range €591-€703). The increase from prior quarter to relapse quarter was strongest for inpatient stays (+ 366%, €432; p < 0.001), day admissions (+ 228%, €57; p < 0.001), and absenteeism (127%, €463; p < 0.001). In the post-relapse quarter, direct costs and costs of absenteeism remained elevated for patients with relapse-associated worsening.

conclusionA recent diagnosis and mild disability lead to high relapse costs. The results suggest the necessity to incorporate patient characteristics when assessing relapse costs.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAbsenteeismAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisProspective StudiesRecurrenceSeverity of Illness IndexYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.