Observational studyPharmacoEconomics2020
Real-World Evidence on the Societal Economic Relapse Costs in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
Observational study in PharmacoEconomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delivering high-quality multiple sclerosis care in Germany: challenges and regional models.Neurological research and practice · 2026Review
- Cost patterns of long-term prescribed medications in patients with multiple sclerosis in Germany.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cost-consequence analysis of early vs. delayed natalizumab use in highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a simulation study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Cost Per Relapse Avoided for Ozanimod Versus Other Selected Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United States.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
- Productivity loss among people with early multiple sclerosis: A Canadian study.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- Gender disparities in health resource utilization in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective longitudinal real-world study with more than 2000 patients.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020Article
- Comparing the long-term clinical and economic impact of ofatumumab versus dimethyl fumarate and glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A cost-consequence analysis from a societal perspective in Germany.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelapses are the hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS). Analyses have shown that the cost of MS increases during periods of relapse. However, results are inconsistent between studies, possibly due to different study designs and the different implications of relapses with respect to patient characteristics.
objectivesThe aims were to estimate and describe direct and indirect relapse costs and to determine differences in costs with respect to patient characteristics. Furthermore, we describe the pharmacoeconomic impact during the relapse follow-up.
methodsData were extracted from two German, multicenter, observational studies applying a validated resource costs instrument. Relapse costs were calculated as the difference in quarterly costs between propensity score (PS)-matched patients with and without relapses (1:1 ratio). For relapse active patients, we additionally calculated the difference between quarterly costs prior to and during relapse and determined costs in the post-relapse quarter.
resultsOf 1882 patients, 607 (32%) presented at least one relapse. After PS-matching, 597 relapse active and relapse inactive patients were retained. Relapse costs (in 2019 values) ranged between €791 (age 50 + years) and €1910 (disease duration < 5 years). In mildly disabled and recently diagnosed patients, indirect relapse costs (range €1073-€1207) constantly outweighed direct costs (range €591-€703). The increase from prior quarter to relapse quarter was strongest for inpatient stays (+ 366%, €432; p < 0.001), day admissions (+ 228%, €57; p < 0.001), and absenteeism (127%, €463; p < 0.001). In the post-relapse quarter, direct costs and costs of absenteeism remained elevated for patients with relapse-associated worsening.
conclusionA recent diagnosis and mild disability lead to high relapse costs. The results suggest the necessity to incorporate patient characteristics when assessing relapse costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32363542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.