Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32363438›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2020

Risky decision-making in individuals with substance use disorder: A meta-analysis and meta-regression review.

Shujuan Chen, Pingyuan Yang, Tianzhen Chen, Hang Su, Haifeng Jiang, Min Zhao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Substance use and the value of control.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of ovarian hormones in risk aversion in female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Largely Intact But Less Reliable and Distributed Neural Representations of Subjective Value in Human Opioid Addiction.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shujuan ChenShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Pingyuan YangShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Tianzhen ChenShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Hang SuShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Haifeng JiangShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Min ZhaoShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China. drminzhao@gmail.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Mental Health Center · CN

Funding

Municipal Human Resources Development Program for Outstanding Young Talents in Medical and Health Sciences in Shanghai 2017YQ013National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1310400National Nature Science Foundation 81771436, U1502228, 81601164Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader 17XD1403300Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders 13DZ2260500Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission 2017ZZ02021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis review aims to identify whether risky decision-making is increased in substance users, and the impact of substance type, polysubstance use status, abstinence period, and treatment status on risky decision-making.

methodsA literature search with no date restrictions was conducted to identify case-control studies or cross-sectional studies that used behavioral tasks to measure risky decision-making in substance users. A random-effects model was performed. GRADE criteria was used to assess the quality of evidence.

results52 studies were enrolled. The result showed that the difference in risky decision-making performance between user groups and control groups was significant (SMD = - 0.590; 95%CI = - 0.849 to - 0.330; p < 0.001; I

conclusionsThe results show that substance use is associated with impaired risky decision-making, indicating that interventions targeting risky decision-making in substance users should be developed for relapse prevention and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingRisk-TakingCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UsersHumansRegression AnalysisSubstance-Related DisordersAddictionMeta-analysisMeta-regressionRisky decision-makingSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID32363438
OpenAlexW3023857100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.