ArticleJournal of neurology2020
Characteristic muscle signatures assessed by quantitative MRI in patients with Bethlem myopathy.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding the Clinico-Genetic Scope of Bethlem Myopathy: A Family of Five Patients from Kerala.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- A Straightforward Approach to Analyze Skeletal Muscle MRI in Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy for Differential Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies Classification and Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Patients With Becker Muscular Dystrophy Have Severe Paraspinal Muscle Involvement.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using MRI, the main aim was to (1) map the pattern of muscle involvement by assessing fat fraction and (2) investigate frequency of target and sandwich signs in 42 muscles of patients with Bethlem myopathy (BM). Fifteen BM patients were included. Results were compared to findings in 8 healthy controls and 50 patients with four other types of muscular dystrophies. All muscles, except one, showed higher fat fraction in BM patients vs healthy controls (p < 0.05) with an overall proximal muscle affection, resembling a limb girdle-like pattern. In moderate patients, the specificity was 90% for the sandwich sign and 98% for the target sign. Sensitivity for both signs was 100%. Twelve BM patients had sandwich sign in other muscles than the vastus lateralis. Muscle strength correlated with fat fraction. Mean fat fraction in the psoas major was 39% in BM patients, which was considerably higher than in 3 of the 4 muscular dystrophy control diseases. The presence of signs in conjunction with severe affection of the psoas major muscle can serve as a diagnostic tool in BM. The high level of STIR lesions in muscles of BM patients warrants further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.