Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32363395›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Deep learning for biological age estimation.

Syed Ashiqur Rahman, Peter Giacobbi, Lee Pyles, Charles Mullett, Gianfranco Doretto, Donald A Adjeroh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk factors for death in patients with acute diquat poisoning.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Syed Ashiqur RahmanDepartment of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506, USA.
Peter GiacobbiSchool of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506, USA.
Lee PylesDepartment of Pediatrics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506, USA.
Charles MullettDepartment of Pediatrics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506, USA.
Gianfranco DorettoDepartment of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506, USA.
Donald A AdjerohDepartment of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506, USA.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
West Virginia Pediatric Clinical Trials Network - 3UG1OD030016 · OD · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI MARGARET JAYNES, LEE A PYLES · 2020 to 2026
$2.9M
The West Virginia Pediatric Clinical Trials NetworkUG1OD024949 · OD · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI COTTRELL, LESLEY A, PYLES, LEE A · 2016 to 2016
$1.8M
The West Virginia Pediatric Clinical Trials NetworkUG1HD090899 · NICHD · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI COTTRELL, LESLEY A, PYLES, LEE A · 2016 to 2016
$2k
NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD090899NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942NIH HHS UG1 OD024949NIH HHS UG1 OD030016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern machine learning techniques (such as deep learning) offer immense opportunities in the field of human biological aging research. Aging is a complex process, experienced by all living organisms. While traditional machine learning and data mining approaches are still popular in aging research, they typically need feature engineering or feature extraction for robust performance. Explicit feature engineering represents a major challenge, as it requires significant domain knowledge. The latest advances in deep learning provide a paradigm shift in eliciting meaningful knowledge from complex data without performing explicit feature engineering. In this article, we review the recent literature on applying deep learning in biological age estimation. We consider the current data modalities that have been used to study aging and the deep learning architectures that have been applied. We identify four broad classes of measures to quantify the performance of algorithms for biological age estimation and based on these evaluate the current approaches. The paper concludes with a brief discussion on possible future directions in biological aging research using deep learning. This study has significant potentials for improving our understanding of the health status of individuals, for instance, based on their physical activities, blood samples and body shapes. Thus, the results of the study could have implications in different health care settings, from palliative care to public health.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAgingAnthropometryBiomarkersComputational BiologyElectronic Health RecordsEpigenesis, GeneticExerciseHumansNeural Networks, ComputerBiomarkersanthropometryartificial intelligencebioinformaticsbiological agebiomarkersdeep learningelectronic health recordshealth indiceslocomotor activity

Identifiers

PMID32363395
PMCPMC8179516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.