ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020
The Presence of Another Person Influences Oscillatory Cortical Dynamics During Dual Brain EEG Recording.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic spatial representation of self and others' actions in the macaque frontal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Revisiting the earliest hyperscanning study: power and functional connectivity in the alpha band may link brains far apart.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Interpersonal coordination in schizophrenia: a concise update on paradigms, computations, and neuroimaging findings.Psychoradiology · 2023Review
- Face-to-face spatial orientation fine-tunes the brain for neurocognitive processing in conversation.iScience · 2022Article
- Brains in Sync: Practical Guideline for Parent-Infant EEG During Natural Interaction.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Construction of a fiber-optically connected MEG hyperscanning system for recording brain activity during real-time communication.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are innately social creatures and the social environment strongly influences brain development. As such, the human brain is primed for and sensitive to social information even in the absence of explicit task or instruction. In this study, we examined the influence of different levels of interpersonal proximity on resting state brain activity and its association with social cognition. We measured EEG in pairs of 13 typically developing (TD) adults seated in separate rooms, in the same room back-to-back, and in the same room facing each other. Interpersonal proximity modulated broadband EEG power from 4-55 Hz and individual differences in self-reported social cognition modulated these effects in the beta and gamma frequency bands. These findings provide novel insight into the influence of social environment on brain activity and its association with social cognition through dual-brain EEG recording and demonstrate the importance of using interactive methods to study the human brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.