Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32362787›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & policy2020

Five pillars for stakeholder analyses in sustainability transformations: The global case of phosphorus.

Christopher Lyon, Dana Cordell, Brent Jacobs, Julia Martin-Ortega, Rachel Marshall, Miller Alonso Camargo-Valero, Erin Sherry

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher LyonSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT UK.
Dana CordellInstitute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW, 2007, Australia.
Brent JacobsInstitute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW, 2007, Australia.
Julia Martin-OrtegaSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT UK.
Rachel MarshallLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ UK.
Miller Alonso Camargo-ValeroBioResource Systems Research Group, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Erin SherryAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, BT9 5PQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorus is a critical agricultural nutrient and a major pollutant in waterbodies due to inefficient use. In the form of rock phosphate it is a finite global commodity vulnerable to price shocks and sourcing challenges. Transforming toward sustainable phosphorus management involves local to global stakeholders. Conventional readings of stakeholders may not reflect system complexity leaving it difficult to see stakeholder roles in transformations. We attempt to remedy this issue with a novel stakeholder analysis method based on five qualitative pillars: stakeholder agency, system roles, power and influence, alignment to the problem, and transformational potential. We argue that our approach suits case studies of individual stakeholders, stakeholder groups, and organisations with relationships to sustainability challenges.

Indexed as

AgricultureFood securityFood systemsNatural resourcesPhosphorusStakeholdersSustainabilityTransformationsWater

Identifiers

PMID32362787
PMCPMC7171702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.