ArticleBritish journal of cancer2020
Lymphoedema screening: setting the standard.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors affecting health-related quality of life following axillary lymph node dissection among breast cancer survivors in Egypt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning and radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2025Article
- Bibliometric and visual analysis of breast cancer-related lymphedema: Knowledge structure, research status, and future trends.Medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of primary lower extremity lymphedema staging using MRI: a preliminary study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- A Delphi-based approach to developing the contents of an online resource, Care Assist, for male caregivers of women with breast cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic Criteria for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema of the Upper Extremity: The Need for Universal Agreement.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Existing literature which is changing practice should be scrutinised, in the interest of all women at risk for lymphoedema after breast cancer (BC). Bundred et al.'s prospective, multicentre trial of 1100 women made several solid findings, and novel screening recommendations presented may assist in incorporating lymphoedema screening into standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.