Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32362451›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2020

A Dynamical Paradigm for Molecular Cell Biology.

John J Tyson, Bela Novak

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The art of modeling gene regulatory circuits.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Biochemical Network Dynamics Using pyDYVIPAC.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Mathematical Models of Death Signaling Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Mathematical Modeling in Circadian Rhythmicity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John J TysonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA; Division of Systems Biology, Academy of Integrated Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. Electronic address: tyson@vt.edu.
Bela NovakDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Stochastic Models of Cell Cycle Regulation in EukaryotesR01GM078989 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI PECCOUD, JEAN M, TYSON, JOHN J. · 2006 to 2018
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The driving passion of molecular cell biologists is to understand the molecular mechanisms that control important aspects of cell physiology, but this ambition is often limited by the wealth of molecular details currently known about these mechanisms. Their complexity overwhelms our intuitive notions of how molecular regulatory networks might respond under normal and stressful conditions. To make progress we need a new paradigm for connecting molecular biology to cell physiology. We suggest an approach that uses precise mathematical methods to associate the qualitative features of dynamical systems, as conveyed by 'bifurcation diagrams', with 'signal-response' curves measured by cell biologists.

Indexed as

Cell BiologyMolecular BiologyCircadian RhythmModels, Biologicalbifurcation diagramsbiochemical kineticsdynamical systemsnetwork diagramssignal–response curves

Identifiers

PMID32362451
PMCPMC8665686
OpenAlexW3022094762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.