Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32362447›Full record

ReviewInjury2020

A comprehensive review of mouse diaphyseal femur fracture models.

Zachary J Gunderson, Zachery R Campbell, Todd O McKinley, Roman M Natoli, Melissa A Kacena

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Injury, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mouse Digit Tip Regeneration Is Mechanical Load Dependent.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary J GundersonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA.
Zachery R CampbellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA.
Todd O McKinleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA.
Roman M NatoliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA.
Melissa A KacenaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA; Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, IN, USA. Electronic address: mkacena@iupui.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Angiogenic Therapy: Novel Approaches to Enhance Bone Regeneration in Aging - LOADR01AG060621 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KACENA, MELISSA A, LI, JILIANG · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
Impact of TPO Treatment on Bone Healing and Angiogenesis in Type 2 DiabetesI01BX003751 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KACENA, MELISSA A · 2017 to 2021
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003751NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complications related to treatment of long bone fractures still stand as a major challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Elucidation of the mechanisms of bone healing and development, and the subsequent alteration of these mechanisms to improve outcomes, typically requires animal models as an intermediary between in vitro and human clinical studies. Murine models are some of the most commonly used in translational research, and mouse fracture models are particularly diverse, offering a wide variety of customization with distinct benefits and limitations depending on the study. This review critically examines three common femur fracture models in the mouse, namely cortical hole, 3-point fracture (Einhorn), and segmental bone defect. We lay out the general procedure for execution of each model, evaluate the practical implications and important advantages/disadvantages of each and describe recent innovations. Furthermore, we explore the applications that each model is best adapted for in the context of the current state of murine orthopaedic research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsFemoral FracturesFracture HealingMiceAnimal modelsBone healingDefectFractureMouseSegmental defect

Identifiers

PMID32362447
PMCPMC7323889
OpenAlexW3017329003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.