Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32362437›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Examining the Utility of a General Substance Use Spectrum Using Latent Trait Modeling.

Allen J Bailey, Peter R Finn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allen J BaileyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 East 10th Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. Electronic address: allebail@iu.edu.
Peter R FinnDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 East 10th Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. Electronic address: finnp@indiana.edu.

Funding

Behavioral Disinhibition in Early-onset AlcoholismR01AA013650 · NIAAA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI FINN, PETER R · 2002 to 2018
$5.5M
INTEGRATIVE PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCH AT INDIANA UNIVERSITYT32DA024628 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrea Grace Hohmann, Kenneth Mackie · 2008 to 2026
$3.1M
Attention-biases and hot cognition in drug dependenceR01DA017924 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI FINN, PETER R · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013650NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017924NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA024628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolysubstance use (PSU; lifetime use of multiple substances) is common among individuals with problematic alcohol/substance use and is associated with poor prognosis and poor physical/mental health. Furthermore, simultaneous co-use of substances, such that drug effects overlap, is also common and related to unique risks (e.g. overdose). Despite the importance of PSU, current diagnostic systems continue to conceptualize problems with alcohol/substances as class-specific constructs (e.g. Stimulant Use Disorder), which essentially ignore many unique PSU processes.

methodsThe current study modeled problems with alcohol, cannabis, stimulants, sedatives, opiates, and simultaneous co-use of these substances as a manifestation of a general substance use continuum versus as correlated class-specific constructs in a sample of young-adults(n = 2482) using confirmatory factor analysis. Utility of the models was evaluated by examining associations between the general substance use spectrum and class-specific latent factors with measures of anxiety, ADHD, adult antisocial problems, borderline symptoms, neuroticism, and intelligence in a subset of the sample(n=847).

resultsFindings supported the conceptualization of problems with all substances, including co-use of substances, as being manifestations of a general substance use spectrum, as class-specific constructs were not differentially associated with other measures of psychological dysfunction. Examination of this general substance use spectrum indicated that all substances, separately and co-use, were robustly informative of this spectrum, but tended to discriminate between different severity levels. DISCUSSION: The general substance use spectrum allows for integration of information from the use and co-use of all substances to provide better assessment of overall problems with substances compared to class-specific constructs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntisocial Personality DisorderAnxiety DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersYoung Adultalcoholco-usedrugsexternalizingHiTOPitem-responsepolysubstancesubstance use

Identifiers

PMID32362437
PMCPMC7293921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.