Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32362355›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2020

Health Care Provider Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Adverse Events and Harm.

Traber D Giardina, Kathryn E Royse, Arushi Khanna, Helen Haskell, Julia Hallisy, Frederick Southwick, Hardeep Singh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04166240 (Measuring and Improving the Safety of Test Result Follow-Up), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04166240 nacompletednot on this map

Measuring and Improving the Safety of Test Result Follow-Up

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2018 to 2023Enrolled46ConditionsLung Cancer, Breast Cancer, Colon Cancer, Bladder CancerArmsSAFER TRACKS Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Revealing the hidden harms in end-of-life care: a mixed-methods characterisation of reported safety incidents involving injectable symptom control medication.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Levels of prevention of non-clinical adverse events in a health unit].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Traber D Giardina
Kathryn E Royse
Arushi Khanna
Helen Haskell
Julia Hallisy
Frederick Southwick
Hardeep Singh
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USFacing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Engaging Patients in Diagnostic Error ReportingK01HS025474 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIARDINA, TRABER L · 2018 to 2022
$764k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS025474Cancer Research UK C8640/A23385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients can provide valuable information missing from traditional sources of safety data, thus adding new insights about factors that lead to preventable harm. In this study, researchers determined associations between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms experienced after an adverse event (AE).

methodsA secondary analysis was conducted of a national sample of patient-reported AEs (surgical, medication, diagnostic, and hospital-acquired infection) gathered through an online questionnaire between January 2010 and February 2016. Generalized logit multivariable regression was used to assess the association between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms (grouped as nonphysical harm only, physical harm only, physical harm and emotional or financial harm, and all three harms) and adjusted for patient and AE characteristics.

resultsOne third of patients (32.6%) reported experiencing all three harms, 27.3% reported physical harms and one additional harm, 25.5% reported physical harms only, and 14.7% reported nonphysical harms only. Patients reporting all three harms were 2.5 times more likely to have filed a report with a responsible authority (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-5.01) and 3.3 times more likely to have also experienced a surgical complication (95% CI = 1.42-7.51). Odds of reporting problems related to communication between clinician and patients/families or clinician-related behavioral issues was 13% higher in those experiencing all three harm types (95% CI = 1.07-1.19).

conclusionPatients' experiences are important to identify safety issues and reduce harm and should be included in patient safety measurement and improvement activities. These findings underscore the need for policy and practice changes to identify, address, and support harmed patients.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPatient SafetyCommunicationHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32362355
PMCPMC7720932
OpenAlexW3007253334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.