ArticleBMC medicine2020
The three numbers you need to know about healthcare: the 60-30-10 Challenge.
Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
144 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Trends in use of the new MeSH term "overdiagnosis": A bibliometric review.Health information and libraries journal · 2025Pooled it
- Staff-reported barriers and facilitators to the implementation of healthcare interventions within regional and rural areas: a rapid review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- The integration of human and non-human actors to advance healthcare delivery: unpacking the role of actor-network theory, a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Pooled it
- Factors that influence the implementation of (inter)nationally endorsed health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary.BMJ quality & safety · 2023Pooled it
- Nudge interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2021Pooled it
- Sustainability of implementation of health-promotion practice in primary healthcare: a non-randomized parallel group study.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Multiple Suggested Care Alternatives and Decision-Making of Primary Care Physicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Digital integration of research conduct into clinical care: results of the PROSPECTOR randomised feasibility study.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Discrepancies in low-value practices across cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. A narrative review.The European journal of general practice · 2026Review
- Measuring uptake of the 2024 national standards for survivorship care: Insights from National Cancer Institute funded pilot projects.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Structural alignment and thematic complementarity between ISO 7101:2023 and Türkiye's hospital quality standards: a qualitative document analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Implementation science and the clinical trial workforce: A national needs assessment of training and practice.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- [Health literacy in primary care: Understanding, managing, and making sense].Atencion primaria · 2026Article
- Avoiding Overuse in German Gynaecology and Obstetrics - Adaptation of the Canadian "Choosing Wisely" Recommendations.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Treatment and outcomes of fractures in children: a registry-based cohort study of 10,144 fractures.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
- Transition from routine arterial blood gas testing to indication-based testing in the intensive care unit: A sustainability in quality improvement initiative.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare represents a paradox. While change is everywhere, performance has flatlined: 60% of care on average is in line with evidence- or consensus-based guidelines, 30% is some form of waste or of low value, and 10% is harm. The 60-30-10 Challenge has persisted for three decades. MAIN BODY: Current top-down or chain-logic strategies to address this problem, based essentially on linear models of change and relying on policies, hierarchies, and standardisation, have proven insufficient. Instead, we need to marry ideas drawn from complexity science and continuous improvement with proposals for creating a deep learning health system. This dynamic learning model has the potential to assemble relevant information including patients' histories, and clinical, patient, laboratory, and cost data for improved decision-making in real time, or close to real time. If we get it right, the learning health system will contribute to care being more evidence-based and less wasteful and harmful. It will need a purpose-designed digital backbone and infrastructure, apply artificial intelligence to support diagnosis and treatment options, harness genomic and other new data types, and create informed discussions of options between patients, families, and clinicians. While there will be many variants of the model, learning health systems will need to spread, and be encouraged to do so, principally through diffusion of innovation models and local adaptations.
conclusionDeep learning systems can enable us to better exploit expanding health datasets including traditional and newer forms of big and smaller-scale data, e.g. genomics and cost information, and incorporate patient preferences into decision-making. As we envisage it, a deep learning system will support healthcare's desire to continually improve, and make gains on the 60-30-10 dimensions. All modern health systems are awash with data, but it is only recently that we have been able to bring this together, operationalised, and turned into useful information by which to make more intelligent, timely decisions than in the past.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.