Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32361986›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of comparative neurology2020

Perceptual rivalry across animal species.

Olivia Carter, Bruno van Swinderen, David A Leopold, Shaun P Collin, Alexander Maier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The exploration of consciousness in insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Conscious birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivia CarterMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7708-6154
Bruno van SwinderenQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6552-7418
David A LeopoldNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1345-6360
Shaun P CollinSchool of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6236-0771
Alexander MaierDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-502X

Funding

Neurophysiology of Visual PerceptionZIAMH002838 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI LEOPOLD, DAVID A · 2009 to 2025
$14.0M
Binocular integration in the primate lateral geniculate nucleusR01EY027402 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MAIER, ALEXANDER VINZENZ · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002838NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review in memoriam of Jack Pettigrew provides an overview of past and current research into the phenomenon of multistable perception across multiple animal species. Multistable perception is characterized by two or more perceptual interpretations spontaneously alternating, or rivaling, when animals are exposed to stimuli with inherent sensory ambiguity. There is a wide array of ambiguous stimuli across sensory modalities, ranging from the configural changes observed in simple line drawings, such as the famous Necker cube, to the alternating perception of entire visual scenes that can be instigated by interocular conflict. The latter phenomenon, called binocular rivalry, in particular caught the attention of the late Jack Pettigrew, who combined his interest in the neuronal basis of perception with a unique comparative biological approach that considered ambiguous sensation as a fundamental problem of sensory systems that has shaped the brain throughout evolution. Here, we examine the research findings on visual perceptual alternation and suppression in a wide variety of species including insects, fish, reptiles, and primates. We highlight several interesting commonalities across species and behavioral indicators of perceptual alternation. In addition, we show how the comparative approach provides new avenues for understanding how the brain suppresses opposing sensory signals and generates alternations in perceptual dominance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionHumansOptical IllusionsPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSpecies SpecificityVisual Perceptionbinocular rivalryDrosophilafishmultistableperceptionprimatesuppression

Identifiers

PMID32361986
PMCPMC7541519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.