ArticleMolecular biology reports2020
Transcriptome and proteome profiles of human umbilical cord vein CD146+ stem cells.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Approaches for the isolation and long-term expansion of pericytes from human and animal tissues.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study we used two different techniques in order to isolate pericytes from the wall of human umbilical cord vein and get two different groups of cells were named as "pellet and primer cells". These groups were compared with each other according to their morphologies and stem cell marker expressions. Also, these two different populations were compared with each other and with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) according to their transcriptomic profiles. Then, pellet cells proteomic profiles were determined. Our results showed that morphologies and cell surface marker expressions of pellet cells and primer cells are similar. On the other hand, according to immunofluorescence staining results, in contrast to primer cells, pellet cells showed positive NG2 and PDGFR-β staining. As a result of gene expression profiling, pellet cells have upregulated genes related with muscle, neural and immune cell differentiation, development and pluripotency. On the other hand, primer cells have upregulated adhesion pathway-related genes. In addition to differences between pellet and primer cells, the gene expression profiles of these cell groups are also different from BM-MSCs. The results of transcriptome and proteome analysis of pellet cells were in consistent with each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32361895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.