ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020
A case of 46,XX/46,XX chimerism in a phenotypically normal woman.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovery and comprehensive analysis of a congenital chimerism via paternity testing using short tandem repeat genotyping.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimerism is the presence of two genetically different cell lines within a single organism, which is rarely observed in humans. Usually, chimerism in the human body is revealed by the finding of an abnormal phenotype during a medical examination or is unexpectedly detected in routine genetic analysis. However, the incidence or underlying mechanism of chimerism remains unclear due to the lack of information on this infrequent biological event. A phenotypically normal woman with a 46,XX karyotype and atypical short tandem repeat (STR) allelic patterns observed in DNA analysis was investigated with various genetic testing methods, including STR typing based on capillary electrophoresis and massively parallel sequencing, genome-wide SNP array, and a differentially methylated parental allele assay (DMPA). The proband's parents were not available for testing to discriminate the parental allelic contribution, but the parents' alleles were recovered from testing the proband's siblings. Based on the results consistently found in multiple analyses using STR and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) polymorphism markers, dispermic fertilization was suggested as the underlying mechanism. The application of various molecular genetic testing methods was used to elucidate the chimerism observed in the proband in this study. In the future, the development of novel genetic markers or techniques, such as DMPA, may have potential use in the investigation of chimerism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32361859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.