ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020
Survival outcomes of resection for pulmonary malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer and pulmonary metastasis after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of cystectomy in single-site oligometastatic bladder cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study of 1,381 patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study investigated survival outcomes of resection for pulmonary malignancies after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma, comparing non-small cell lung cancer and pulmonary metastases.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent resection for pulmonary malignancies after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma between 2009 and 2018. The overall survival and relapse-free survival rate were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
resultsEleven patients had non-small cell lung cancer and eight patients had pulmonary metastases from esophageal carcinoma. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.9% in all patients with a median follow-up period of 50.4 (range: 9.1-130.2) months. While the 5-year overall survival rate was 100.0% in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, it was 85.7% in patients with pulmonary metastases from esophageal carcinoma. The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 85.7% in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
conclusionsOur data suggest that resection for pulmonary malignancies after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma is associated with favorable survival outcomes and should be considered in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.