Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32361805›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

CycleGAN-based deep learning technique for artifact reduction in fundus photography.

Tae Keun Yoo, Joon Yul Choi, Hong Kyu Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic performance of deep-learning-based virtual chromoendoscopy in gastric neoplasms.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tae Keun YooDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical Research Center, Aerospace Medical Center, Republic of Korea Air Force, 635 Danjae-ro, Sangdang-gu, Cheongju, South Korea. eyetaekeunyoo@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0890-8614
Joon Yul ChoiEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Hong Kyu KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA low quality of fundus photograph with artifacts may lead to false diagnosis. Recently, a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) has been introduced as a tool to generate images without matching paired images. Therefore, herein, we present a deep learning technique that removes the artifacts automatically in a fundus photograph using a CycleGAN model.

methodsThis study included a total of 2206 anonymized retinal images including 1146 with artifacts and 1060 without artifacts. In this experiment, we applied the CycleGAN model to color fundus photographs with a pixel resolution of 256 × 256 × 3. To apply the CycleGAN to an independent dataset, we randomly divided the data into training (90%) and test (10%) datasets. Additionally, we adopted the automated quality evaluation (AQE) to assess the retinal image quality.

resultsFrom the results, we observed that the artifacts such as overall haze, edge haze, lashes, arcs, and uneven illumination were successfully reduced by the CycleGAN in the generated images, and the main information of the retina was essentially retained. Further, we observed that most of the generated images exhibited improved AQE grade values when compared with the original images with artifacts.

conclusionThus, we could conclude that the CycleGAN technique can effectively reduce the artifacts and improve the quality of fundus photographs, and it may be beneficial for clinicians in analyzing the low-quality fundus photographs. Future studies should improve the quality and resolution of the generated image to provide a more detailed fundus photography.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsDeep LearningDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalFundus OculiHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhotographyRetinaArtifactDeep learningFundus photographyGenerative adversarial networkImage quality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.