ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020
[Stroke aftercare : Treatment reality, challenges and future perspectives].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of Maslow's theory-based case management model on the care of stroke patients.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- [Position paper on stroke aftercare of the German Stroke Society-Part 3: structural concepts for future forms of care of stroke aftercare].Der Nervenarzt · 2022Review
- [Position paper on stroke aftercare of the German Stroke Society-Part 1: long-term care after stroke: status quo of the reality and deficits of care in Germany].Der Nervenarzt · 2022Review
- Long-term recovery of upper limb motor function and self-reported health: results from a multicenter observational study 1 year after discharge from rehabilitation.Neurological research and practice · 2021Article
- [Complications after stroke : Clinical challenges in stroke aftercare].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegistry data demonstrate a high risk of recurrent stroke and rehospitalization rates after first-time stroke in Germany compared to the international level. Meanwhile, a report of the Institute for Applied Quality Assurance in the Healthcare System (aQua institute) pointed out the potential for improvement of post-stroke care in Germany.
objectiveTo establish perspectives for improvement of outpatient post-stroke care in Germany.
methodsCritical discussion of important aspects of post-stroke care, presentation of the current structures of healthcare provision and possibilities for improvement of post-stroke care.
resultsPost-stroke care in Germany is predominantly carried out by general practitioners. Currently, standard healthcare procedures do not provide a comprehensive supportive system of structured and cross-sectoral aftercare after ischemic stroke. Special attention must be paid to the treatment of cardiovascular risk factors according to the guidelines, a specific and rapid provision of assist devices and physiotherapy as well as prevention and treatment of stroke-associated complications. Previous investigations have revealed sometimes clear deficits in the provision of treatment. The reasons include but are not limited to sectoral barriers that are difficult to overcome. New concepts of post-stroke care for improvement of these deficits are currently undergoing clinical testing.
conclusionIschemic stroke should be considered as a complex chronic disease and should be treated accordingly after discharge from acute inpatient treatment. Emphasis should be placed on the optimization of interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral cooperation and support for general practitioners in the outpatient post-stroke care. New concepts of post-stroke care have the potential for improvement of the current healthcare structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.