Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32361405›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2020

The acid response network of Staphylococcus aureus.

Chunyi Zhou, Paul D Fey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Loss of the ApJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biodiversity of the antimicrobial potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Proteomic Analysis of the Differential Response ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chunyi ZhouDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Paul D FeyDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States. Electronic address: pfey@unmc.edu.

Funding

The S. aureus biofilm lifecycleP01AI083211 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KIELIAN, TAMMY L · 2009 to 2023
$32.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus colonizes or causes infection in a multitude of niches within a mammalian host. Many of these niches are acidic, yet specific pH resistance mechanisms that facilitate survival have not been thoroughly investigated. This review discusses recent studies documenting known acid resistance mechanisms in S. aureus and other staphylococcal species. However, studies that clearly define the regulation of the acid resistance regulon and potential interactions with weak organic acids in specific niches of the host including the skin and gut are yet to be defined.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationStress, PhysiologicalBacterial ProteinsHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysRegulonSecond Messenger SystemsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32361405
PMCPMC7311314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.