ArticleiScience2020
Assessing Cell Activities rather than Identities to Interpret Intra-Tumor Phenotypic Diversity and Its Dynamics.
Article in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EMT-driven plasticity prospectively increases cell-cell variability to promote therapeutic adaptation in breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- An engineered pancreatic cancer model with intra-tumoral heterogeneity of driver mutations.Lab on a chip · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in single-cell and molecular techniques, it is still unclear how to best quantify phenotypic heterogeneity in cancer cells that evolved beyond normal, known classifications. We present an approach to phenotypically characterize cells based on their activities rather than static classifications. We validated the detectability of specific activities (epithelial-mesenchymal transition, glycolysis) in single cells, using targeted RT-qPCR analyses and in vitro inductions. We analyzed 50 established activity signatures as a basis for phenotypic description in public data and computed cell-cell distances in 28,513 cells from 85 patients and 8 public datasets. Despite not relying on any classification, our measure correlated with standard diversity indices in populations of known structure. We identified bottlenecks as phenotypic diversity reduced upon colorectal cancer initiation. This suggests that focusing on what cancer cells do rather than what they are can quantify phenotypic diversity in universal fashion, to better understand and predict intra-tumor heterogeneity dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.