Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32361156›Full record

ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2020

Cone-beam breast computed tomography using ultra-fast image reconstruction with constrained, total-variation minimization for suppression of artifacts.

Hsin Wu Tseng, Srinivasan Vedantham, Andrew Karellas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hsin Wu TsengDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, United States.
Srinivasan VedanthamDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, United States.
Andrew KarellasDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, United States. Electronic address: andrewkarellas@radiology.arizona.edu.

Funding

Towards screening with high-resolution, low-dose, dedicated breast CTR01CA199044 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SRINIVASAN VEDANTHAM · 2016 to 2026
$6.1M
Upright, Low-dose, High-resolution, 3D Breast CTR01CA241709 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI VEDANTHAM, SRINIVASAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Role of 3D Tomography in Breast CancerR21CA134128 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GLICK, STEPHEN J, KARELLAS, ANDREW · 2009 to 2010
$723k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199044NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241709NCI NIH HHS R21 CA134128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compressed sensing based iterative reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography such as adaptive steepest descent-projection on convex sets (ASD-POCS) are attractive due to their applicability in incomplete datasets such as sparse-view data and can reduce radiation dose to the patients while preserving image quality. Although IR algorithms reduce image noise compared to analytical Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm, they may generate artifacts, particularly along the periphery of the object. One popular solution is to use finer image-grid followed by down-sampling. This approach is computationally intensive but may be compensated by reducing the field of view. Our proposed solution is to replace the algebraic reconstruction technique within the original ASD-POCS by ordered subsets-simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (OS-SART) and with initialization using FDK image. We refer to this method as Fast, Iterative, TV-Regularized, Statistical reconstruction Technique (FIRST). In this study, we investigate FIRST for cone-beam dedicated breast CT with large image matrix. The signal-difference to noise ratio (SDNR), the difference of the mean value and the variance of adipose and fibroglandular tissues for both FDK and FIRST reconstructions were determined. With FDK serving as the reference, the root-mean-square error (RMSE), bias, and the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of microcalcifications in two orthogonal directions were also computed. Our results suggest that FIRST is competitive to the finer image-grid method with shorter reconstruction time. Images reconstructed using the FIRST do not exhibit artifacts and outperformed FDK in terms of image noise. This suggests the potential of this approach for radiation dose reduction in cone-beam breast CT.

Indexed as

ArtifactsCone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioTime FactorsArtifactsASD-POCSBreastBreast CTComputed tomographyStatistical image reconstructionTV-POCS

Identifiers

PMID32361156
PMCPMC7295390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.