ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2020
Automated ICD coding via unsupervised knowledge integration (UNITE).
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recent Advances in AI for Automated ICD Coding: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- Using large language models to enhance clinically-driven missing data recovery algorithms in electronic health records.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of different feature extraction methods for applicable automated ICD coding.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Automatic multilabel detection of ICD10 codes in Dutch cardiology discharge letters using neural networks.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAccurate coding is critical for medical billing and electronic medical record (EMR)-based research. Recent research has been focused on developing supervised methods to automatically assign International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes from clinical notes. However, supervised approaches rely on ICD code data stored in the hospital EMR system and is subject to bias rising from the practice and coding behavior. Consequently, portability of trained supervised algorithms to external EMR systems may suffer.
methodWe developed an unsupervised knowledge integration (UNITE) algorithm to automatically assign ICD codes for a specific disease by analyzing clinical narrative notes via semantic relevance assessment. The algorithm was validated using coded ICD data for 6 diseases from Partners HealthCare (PHS) Biobank and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III). We compared the performance of UNITE against penalized logistic regression (LR), topic modeling, and neural network models within each EMR system. We additionally evaluated the portability of UNITE by training at PHS Biobank and validating at MIMIC-III, and vice versa.
resultsUNITE achieved an averaged AUC of 0.91 at PHS and 0.92 at MIMIC over 6 diseases, comparable to LR and MLP. It had substantially better performance than topic models. In regards to portability, the performance of UNITE was consistent across different EMR systems, superior to LR, topic models and neural network models.
conclusionUNITE accurately assigns ICD code in EMR without requiring human labor, and has major advantages over commonly used machine learning approaches. In addition, the UNITE attained stable performance and high portability across EMRs in different institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.